Raped, tracked, humiliated: Clergy wives speak out about domestic violence

Women who were married to abusive priests are for the first time revealing their experiences of sexual assault, control and fear. They say the church has known for decades that some clergy abuse their wives but has done very little to fix the ongoing problem.

By Julia Baird and Hayley Gleeson
Illustrations by Rocco Fazzari

Updated

It's not easy divorcing a priest, let alone a violent one.

Jane has taken up smoking since she separated, wears more make-up and listens to music at full volume — all of which would have intensely irritated her ex-husband.

Rebellion has many guises; some self-destructive, others artless and unaffected.

On a cool Spring afternoon in Sydney's outer suburbs, she stands in her kitchen, turning up the volume to the song, Praying, Kesha's paean to staring down — and surpassing — abusive men, and says, over and over, as her feet slide in rhythm on the floor, "This is my song! It's mine. This song is everything."

You brought the flames and you put me through hell
I had to learn how to fight for myself
And we both know all the truth I could tell
I'll just say this: I wish you farewell

Days spent dancing are rare for Jane, though. Some weeks she drops her children to school then crawls back into bed, spent.

She is on the single parent pension and regularly goes days without food. But, just recently, she told 7.30 and ABC News, she has found her voice. And, like other women who have spoken out about abuse in a sudden recent spate of global assault allegations, she is determined.

When she speaks of her faith in God, her face shines. When she speaks of the violence she experienced at the hands of her husband, a senior Anglican priest who worked in a series of parishes across Australia, she trembles.

And when she speaks of the response of the church to her plight, her jaw sets in anger.

Family and domestic violence support services:

Every night of her 20-year marriage, Jane's husband would wake her up several times for sex. If she objected, he would wait until she fell asleep again.

"He was very sexually abusive from the start," she said.

"He would watch pornography, drink heavily, and come to bed. I would wake up with him touching me, inside me and I'd say to him, 'Stop I'm pregnant' or 'I'm really tired' and he would just wait until I fell back to sleep and continue. He knew how much it upset me.

"If I said 'no' during sex or 'no I don't want to do that', he would get angry and sulk. And so it was better for me to give in than to have to put up with that.

"Or he would get angry with the kids, so if I gave him sex he wouldn't get angry. Therefore the kids wouldn't cop the abuse.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume.

 
Rewind 10 Seconds
00:00
00:00
09:58
Fullscreen
Video: Anglican victims of domestic violence speak out (7.30)

The young mother became sleep deprived and exhausted. Finally, she decided she could not continue to cater to her husband's needs at the expense of her own health.

"I actually went to him one night and I said 'I need a break from our sexual relationship ... and we need to work on our marriage'. He said: 'I'm here for you, you have my support', and then he proceeded to rape me.

"He took what he wanted. And I think he knew in his mind it was one of the last times that he could have me."

Jane was devastated by the assault. She became deeply depressed, stopped eating and had a breakdown: "I was very unwell for about a year, I really struggled with everything."

Her husband even confessed his sins to a member of the church hierarchy, who told Jane that, if it was true, she should report him to police. But, Jane says, the clergy member did not offer her any support.

A year later, she left her husband for good.

Abuse of clergy wives covered up and ignored

Jane is part of a private online support group of Anglican clergy wives in New South Wales who were abused by their husbands.

They message each other or speak most days, providing a sympathetic ear or suggesting new counsellors when things are desperate.

What stunned them when they first met for dinner were two things. First, how many of them there were, and how common and continuing this problem seemed to be.

Second were the similarities in their experiences: after committing their lives to supporting their husband's ministry, each had been forced to leave after decades of emotional, financial and sexual abuse which had left them depressed, fearful and, for some, suicidal.

Several had been part of Moore Theological College in Sydney — the training seminary of the Anglican Diocese of Sydney — when their husbands studied to be priests. All had mixed experiences with the church after disclosing their abuse: some clergy had supported them and pleaded their cases, while others ignored them.

All had disappointing or bruising experiences with a senior church leader when they asked for help.

It has been a year since they found each other, a year spent submitting police reports, talking for hours, struggling to pay bills and seeing psychologists. And they now also share a common anger.

They claim to have been silenced, their abuse covered up and their experiences ignored by a hierarchy that, they say, continues to see domestic violence as a peripheral female problem.

Several months ago, an investigation by 7.30 and ABC News revealed women in Christian communities were being told to endure or forgive domestic violence, and stay in abusive relationships, often due to misappropriation of Bible verses on submission.

Since then, hundreds of women — a number of whom were clergy wives from different denominations across Australia — have contacted us to tell their stories.

Many did so out of frustration that some church leaders had responded to reports of domestic violence with denial, demanding urgent response.

In recent weeks, the national and Sydney Anglican churches have formally apologised to survivors of domestic violence in their ranks, and even confessed some clergy were perpetrators.

The problem is this: the Australian church knew this was happening decades ago — that it was not just rogue parishioners who were abusing their spouses, but its leaders, too. And very little has been done to fix it.

We asked if you could relate to the stories shared in this article. Take a look at what some of our readers shared in the comments.

The church has known for decades

The most detailed report of sexual violence among Australian clergy cannot be easily found online, nor in any church offices. No-one seems to have heard of it.

But buried in a back room of the Queen Victoria Women's Centre, a striking red brick building which sits in a grove of mirrored towers in Melbourne's CBD, rests a series of incendiary reports published in the 1990s.

Contained in them are warnings to the church that some members of its clergy were being violent to their spouses and families, and that this merited urgent action.

The archives belong to the Centre Against Sexual Assault (CASA House), part of the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne, which conducted seminal research on violence in the church.

The first publication, The Pastoral Report to the Churches on Sexual Violence Against Women and Children in the Church Community, was produced in 1990 in collaboration with the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Churches of Christ, Uniting Church and Salvation Army.

It found some clergymen had sexually assaulted women in their families (as well as parishioners), and it recommended bishops and administrators in religious organisations act.

"The painful reality that clergy are involved in criminal activity can no longer be ignored and protocol is urgently needed in response to these acts where sexual violence ... is perpetrated against clergy wives and children," the report stated.

Then, in 1994, in consultation with the Anglican Diocese of Melbourne, CASA published Public Face, Private Pain: The Anglican Report About Violence Against Women and the Abuse of Power within the Church Community.

They reported women were suffering physical and emotional abuse "in silence": 9 per cent had been abused by clergymen. More than half had experienced sexual violence — at 58 per cent, significantly higher than any other form of abuse.

One woman said: "My husband won't let me have the housekeeping money unless we have sex". Another woman was hospitalised after decades of "consistent forced intercourse".

Crucially, the women interviewed stated "unanimously" that it was more difficult to report abuse when a priest was involved. When they did, "They were often bitterly disappointed and disillusioned at the response of authorities".

The women worried about damaging "the public image of the men" and upsetting the congregation. Many made the choice to remain silent rather than risk backlash from the church.

According to the report: "[T]his concern was reasonable given the experiences of many women who were stigmatised when they did disclose to church leaders."

What church leaders needed to understand, the report found, was that this was criminal behaviour. They needed to stop using euphemisms like "marriage breakdown" and "relationship difficulties" to describe violence against women.

Troublingly, churches had frequently responded to complaints against clergy of sexual or other violence by simply moving offenders to different parishes, states or roles within the church, such as "administration or pastoral positions, for example, industrial chaplaincy or youth ministry".

The researchers strongly condemned this practice: "Ministers of the church are representatives of God's love, which is about trust, service, healing, leadership and respect for the vulnerable. Sexual violence perpetrated by a church leader … should have serious and long-term consequences regarding their status as a priest."

Barbara Roberts, leader of the website A Cry for Justice, created for Christian survivors of domestic violence, said this is a familiar pattern: "Abusive ministers may be quietly urged to move churches or move into administrative roles by their colleagues who are aware of the allegations of abuse."

Another concern arises, Ms Roberts said, in denominations where, "they can still enable a corrupt clergyman to continue abusing by giving him a reference which fails to disclose the allegations that had been made against him".

According to clergy wives interviewed by the ABC, in the 27 years since the CASA reports were published, very little has changed.

Rebecca says priests have been moved from parish to parish or from rectory to chaplaincy or schools: "There are a number of cases where the abusive clergyman has been stood down for a time. I don't see that it's ever permanent and I think often it's just swept under the rug, pushed on for someone else to deal with as was the case in my circumstance."

Life as the wife of a priest, the 'face of the church'

Being the wife of a priest or pastor is a particular, exacting job. It requires a lot of sacrifice: to your husband, the church and the demands of the parish.

It is work that, while deemed holy, requires a great deal of commitment, devotion and patience with long hours and odd demands.

It is also unpaid, a fact that leaves many wives vulnerable if their marriages end. Out of the workforce sometimes for decades and still caring for children, they can find themselves without a house (they will need to leave the rectory) or without any income (if their husband loses his job due to his abuse, finances are instantly precarious).

But, according to Jess, who was married to a Presbyterian minister, clergy wives are discouraged from "selfishly" pursuing a career.

Some women feel trapped because, as Jane says, expectations on clergy families to be role models as "the face of the church" are high.

"We were taught through the church you always speak highly of your husband. And you obey him, you're submissive, you ask permission to do things, and that was my life." Seeking help, she said, was hard.

Others found the higher their husbands climbed, the greater the risk of abuse.

Jess said: "The more power he gained in a ministerial position, the more rigid and emotionally dominating he became. He didn't like confident women and wanted to see them submit. He used physical force during arguments, like grabbing my face, neck, [putting his] hand over my mouth and nose.

"He told me that behaviour was necessary and I had brought it on myself as I had raised my voice or shown contempt for him."

It is rare for children to be unaffected by domestic abuse, and many times they, too are targets.

Jane's husband disciplined their kids with his hands and sticks. When she tried to intervene, she would bear the blunt brunt of his anger: "[I]t was scary."

Rebecca did not want to leave her children alone with her Anglican pastor husband.

"I witnessed a lot of abuse of the kids that left me in tears, and just terrified," she said. "[I saw] him throwing the kids, pushing them, pulling them, smothering them … locking my children outside with no clothes on in the middle of winter at night because they wouldn't go to sleep. That was their punishment."

The danger, says Jane, comes when men claim full authority over their wives.

"Men, when they're given that amount of control, tend to abuse. If they know their wife has to obey what they want, then how easy is it for them to say, 'All I want you to do is do this, you have to do that, you have to have sex with me'? You know there's no accountability with these men."

Isabella Young (not her real name), an Anglican survivor who is writing a book on domestic violence in the church, says the problem is made worse when the congregation is not informed of the reasons for a ministry couple separating or leaving their church, which allows, "a cloud of ambiguity to form as to what was going on in the marriage".

"There is frequently no impression given that any serious transgressions have occurred," Ms Young said.

This strips the wife of potential support she could have in the congregation: "In abusive ministry marriages, the cloud frequently forms over the wife's reputation but it also allows the abuser an escape without appropriate consequences.

"I'm tired of hearing how pastors who are abusive to their wives, frequently meting out such abuse in the presence of their children and are sometimes directly abusive towards their children, are not publicly held to account."

This, she added, "has unfortunate consequences in that some [pastors] are subsequently employed in para-church organisations or … schools, without their employers being any the wiser as to their true character."

Teaching of submission 'enables' abusive men

Every one of the clergy wives who spoke to 7.30 and ABC News claimed the teaching of submission contributed to their abuse.

The verses usually cited for this doctrine are Ephesians 5:22-24:

"Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, just as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Saviour. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands."

The verses are intended, according to those who teach them, to be about (male) sacrificial love and (female) voluntary submission.

But in practice, these women say, it can mean an entirely different thing.

Rebecca winced when her Anglican pastor husband gave sermons on the subject.

"He preached about a husband loving his wife as Christ loved the church but I didn't see that at home," she said. "But he preached about submission and I heard it my whole life: that that's what a wife did, and that's what I believed was my role as his wife. I think I understood it to mean I had to be quiet."

The use of the word "submit", Rebecca says, is, "unhelpful when there's such an abuse problem in the church, I think it enables abusers and keeps victims within an abusive marriage".

The focus on submission is more pronounced in some quarters of the Australian church, usually those that have male-only priesthoods (meaning women should submit both at home and at church).

When Kylie met her "charming" Anglican husband, for example, they were both involved in "conservative, fundamentalist Christian circles" with a heavy emphasis on male 'headship' and female 'submission'.

At her university Christian group, she was taught that if she wanted to marry: "I should make sure it was to a man I could submit to and trust completely, as after we were married he would be the one to 'lead' and make all of the decisions for the family."

When she fell in love with a charismatic man, she agreed to follow this model of marriage. But what she did not expect to have to submit to was petty, controlling, emotionally abusive behaviour that escalated over time:

"There was one time when I hadn't folded the laundry and put it away and he threw it out of the house and said it was cluttering up the living area and when I went out to get it, he told me I couldn't sleep in the house that night because I'd been a disobedient wife. He'd made it clear he didn't want the laundry in the house and I'd defied him and brought it back in. It didn't ever occur to me that this was unreasonable of him."

Slowly Kylie sank under the weight of household duties and postnatal depression, believing it would be inappropriate to ask for help.

"The church and college told me it was my role to carry the burden at home so he could focus on ministry, and that asking for more from him would be sinful.

"I believe many of the college's teachings — on wifely submission, for instance — laid the groundwork for men to treat their wives badly. As a ministry wife I was also told by the college that it was my job to give my husband sex whenever he wanted, any time of the day or night."

Her husband began to encourage her to leave, telling her he and their children would be better off if she wasn't around. Kylie began to wonder if he might be right, and contemplated suicide.

Then, one morning, when she was preparing to leave him, her husband raped her. When she tells the story, she grows pale and starts to shake.

"I tried to stop him, but my children were in the next room, I didn't want to make a loud noise because they were right there listening. I didn't know what to do it was really unexpected and I just tried to push him off and close my legs and stop it happening but I couldn't."

A short time later, she went to the police.

'Your job is to give your husband sex whenever he wants it'

One of the striking similarities in the stories of these women is the prevalence of rape. For many, the question of consent was blurry.

It took several years, for example, before Rebecca realised what her husband, an Anglican priest, was doing was wrong.

"I was forced to do things I didn't feel comfortable with," she said.

"He would hurt me physically when we had sex and I feared sometimes when he strangled me when we were having sex that I would pass out. It genuinely terrified me that he wouldn't know when to stop. I didn't know if I would die."

Rebecca told 7.30 she had been taught that if she loved her husband she would submit to him in all things, so she endured the pain.

"I felt like it was how I could submit to him, and give into his desires and his needs. That was my way of loving him and honouring him."

It was not until she confided in a friend that she realised what was happening. "She said that wasn't right, she looked it up online to show me I was actually being raped. That was a real eye opener for me that what was happening in our marriage was, in fact, illegal."

Part of the problem, Kylie says, is that in some churches, women are told sexual availability is a wife's responsibility and that while this teaching is intended to foster intimacy in marriage, some men misinterpret it as meaning they can demand what they want, when they want.

"[At Moore Theological college in Sydney, where my husband trained] we were given regular specific teaching sessions that would help us be good minister's wives.

"Things like, your job is to give your husband sex whenever he wants it anytime of the day or night … this is the message we were given: be ready if he pops home in his lunch break to drop everything, and have sex.

"We were never ever given any hint that it might be okay to say no."

Emily says she was never taught at that college that women had to provide sex without consent, "but the teaching on sex was extremely coercive".

"We were told that we, as wives, are the only people who can serve our husbands in this way, and the strong implication was that we were harming [our husbands'] gospel ministry by not giving it," she said.

"I even heard one Moore College lecturer teach from the front that sex should be provided daily. And he gave biblical 'evidence'."

Similar concerns about marital rape in some faith forums have been aired recently in America.

On conservative Christian website BiblicalGenderRoles.com, married men were told they "should not tolerate refusal" of sex, and that if their wives "begrudged" their advances, they should look at their bodies, not their faces.

Men were also advised a woman's unwillingness to submit to her husband's desire for sex is a "sinful rebellion against God's design".

No true Christian would advise or condone rape. This is anathema to the faith, and the faithful.

But what abuse survivors have told the ABC repeatedly is that there is tone deafness in some influential quarters and powerful theological colleges to teaching on sex that fails to recognise the importance of mutual consent. The consequences of this are horrific.

There are several recent examples. In 2016, at a conference for women in Sydney where domestic violence was discussed, a session on "Appreciating God's Gift of Sex" gave as one example of challenges that can "fracture the beauty of sex", along with pornography and busyness: "women calling the shots in the bedroom".

Other statements made included: "Like the rest of the Christian life, sex is about service", and, "One way we serve our spouse is by fulfilling the sexual obligation we owe".

In 2008, in a parody of C. S. Lewis's The Screwtape Letters, one senior woman wrote that God, "really thinks we have an obligation to give our husbands as much sex as he wants!"

In this context, she cited a verse from Corinthians: "For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does."

Coercion 'has no place in clergy marriages'

When Moore College recently published a guide for clergy wives called Domestic Violence: A Starting Point in Supporting Victims, the clergy wives who were actual victims fumed.

In advice on "Building Healthy Marriages", the author says the only reason for denying your husband sex is by "mutual consent", so you can devote yourself to prayer.

Sex, she wrote, "should be seen as the cement in the relationship — it is not just the icing on the cake".

What truly angered the women, though, was that the first two chapters of the guide, written by the head of Moore Theological College in Newtown, Mark Thompson, were dedicated solely to upholding the doctrine of submission.

"I think there's some good content in there," said Kylie. "But you have to read through around 25 or 30 pages of defending the church's teachings about [male] headship and [female] submission before you even get to anything focused on the victims in any way."

Dr Thompson, speaking to 7.30 in his home opposite the college near Sydney University, says while he is aware there have been other cases, he has only ever met with one clergy wife who had been abused by her husband. He says she did not ask for any clarification of the meaning of submission.

The reason he puts so much emphasis on the "right kind" of submission, he says, is "precisely because people are using the language of submission in a way that is contrary to the way the bible does".

"I want to be the most vocal voice saying you've misused the Bible ... the Bible's teaching on marriage is that it is modelled on the loving self sacrifice of Christ who loved the church by dying for it so he could save it — that's what submission means in this particular context," he said.

"It's got nothing to do with power, domination, nothing to do with coercion."

Sex, Dr Thompson says, "is a good gift that does operate as one of the glues of good marriages [but] to demand sex and not see it as a free gift is to take something good and destroy it.

"One of the ways we serve in marriage is a giving of our bodies to one another freely and voluntarily ... The insistence, the demand, coercion, has no place in marriage at all, and it has no place in clergy marriages."

The Moore College Domestic Violence Policy, which was finalised in May 2015, spells out, "domestic violence is contrary to the biblical pattern of mutual love and care of each other in marriage, anchored in the example of the Lord Jesus Christ".

It also decreed the College would not "tolerate, overlook or conceal" any instance of domestic violence in the College community.

But some of the wives whose husbands studied at Moore object to the stipulation in the policy that, "the person who has acted violently" will need to meet with the dean or principal to show cause why they, "should be allowed to continue as a member of the College community, complete their studies, or continue in their role as a member of the Faculty or a chaplain".

Why, they ask, should men be allowed to stay there if they have acted violently?

Dr Thompson says they most likely won't. The policy, he says, is "framed in the way in which you need to frame these policies … but the plan is, every person who'd come, engaged in domestic violence, is not suitable to be involved in ministry".

He said: "If somebody has been shown to act violently they would be counselled out of training and ministry, [though] you need to leave room for some of these issues to be sorted through, we just wanted to be fair and equitable and just."

He recognises, though, that significant work remains: "I'm not satisfied that we've yet done enough and one of the reasons why we apologised in the synod recently was because we recognised that not enough has been done. But we're saying we want to do more than we've done."

An apology without action 'means nothing'

Rebecca is cautious: "I think they're allowing perpetrators to continue on, one in ministry, and two to continue abusing. There's really no repercussions for someone who's found out to be abusive and I think they really undermine the power that an abuser has within his family and how terrifying that is," she said.

"I think there should just be something in place to make sure there's swift action taken."

Canon Sandy Grant, the chairman of the Sydney Anglican Domestic Violence Task Force, says the stories he has heard of marital rape are disturbing.

"There is no excuse for forcing yourself on another person, sexually, or demanding sex from another person and I'm shocked and appalled to hear that there have been cases where that's happened," he said.

The reason Canon Grant led an apology to all victims of domestic violence in the church at Sydney Synod a few weeks ago was because he realised: "I as a conservative had not done enough to guard against the twistings of scripture in ways that give comfort to abusers or that victims might hear as inviting them to continue as the victims and not to get the help they need. I was convinced we needed to do more."

To some survivors, the Anglican Church's apology was a good and welcome start, but to others, it was simply a symbolic gesture.

Jane says: "[It] means nothing because when I left I was treated like a criminal … They [the church] wanted to get rid of me, they wanted to pretend none of [my abuse] happened. There was no real support … I need help and understanding, not someone saying you're out of our sight now, we don't have to worry about you."

Others are more optimistic.

Rebecca was pleased to at last have some acknowledgment, which she believes to be sincere, but adds: "An apology without action is empty so I'd like to see further things put in place to make sure they really mean what they say."

How are churches dealing with abusive clergy?

There is very little data on abusive clergy in Australia, largely because churches have not systematically collected and recorded it.

But ABC News asked all the major Christian churches in Australia (excluding the Catholic Church, which requires priests to be celibate), how they have handled allegations of domestic abuse against clergy in the past 10 years.

(While the 7.30 story focused on one particular support group of women from Sydney Anglican churches, ABC News surveyed the rest of the country as well, over a period of months, searching for information about abused clergy wives across denominations).

Many said they were unable to disclose data on these kinds of complaints because the information was either too sensitive, too difficult to compile or simply unavailable.

However, a handful of churches said they had received and acted on some complaints in which domestic abuse was a factor.

The NSW Presbyterian Church, according to Mrs Elizabeth McLean, the CEO of the Safe Churches Unit, has acted on domestic violence policies with respect to ministers and other church leaders, "on a small number of occasions in recent years".

And a spokesman for Baptist Churches NSW and ACT said:

"Over the last five years we can recall less than five allegations received by our office of domestic violence by clergy. All of these were extensively investigated, including, where required by our policies, by an independent investigator … appropriate disciplinary action was taken where any allegations were substantiated."

It's clear the church is currently grappling with how best to prevent and respond to domestic violence, as are a host of institutions.

But many churches seem to be taking an ad-hoc, piecemeal approach; while a handful have introduced policies specifically for handling domestic violence, others have scrambled to adapt or extend child sexual abuse protocols to include domestic abuse.

Survivors claim many churches seem to be preoccupied with avoiding public scrutiny following the revelations of child sexual abuse in the royal commission, and have sought to handle abuse matters quickly and quietly behind closed doors, often to the detriment of victims.

And even where formal domestic violence policies do exist, there is frequently a lack of clarity around what, if any, the professional consequences for clergy found to be abusing their spouse would be.

Church leaders may espouse "no tolerance" for domestic violence, but survivors say it's rarely put into practice.

If a complaint were to be made against clergy in the Anglican Diocese of Melbourne, for example, a spokesperson said: "It would be both a matter of 'fitness' for continued ministry and — if the complaint was upheld — there would be an independent disciplinary process including, but not limited to, deposition from holy orders."

Bishop Richard Condie of the Anglican Diocese of Tasmania said if such a complaint were received, "The clergy person against whom the allegations were made would be immediately stood down".

Criminal matters, he said, would be reported to the police, an internal investigation would take place, and a "diocesan tribunal" would be convened to hear the allegations.

Importantly, some churches and training institutions (including Moore Theological College) have begun to make efforts to screen men for bullying or violent tendencies before accepting them as candidates for ordination.

Assistant Bishop Tim Harris, from the Anglican Diocese of Adelaide, said: "We now apply rigorous psychological testing before being accepted for formation. We have declined to accept at least half a dozen candidates for concerns over inappropriate behaviour or character traits."

Life after abuse: Homelessness, poverty, PTSD

What remains of greatest concern for survivors, though, is the lack of any significant financial provision for the wives of abusive clergy.

These women, who have sometimes served parishes for decades, raising families while their husbands prepared sermons and hosted bible study groups, are suddenly left without a source of income when they leave their marriage.

Rectors' wives are required to move out of church housing, and many have nowhere to go.

This is the case in churches across the world. Lesley Orr Macdonald, the author of Out of the Shadows: Christianity and Violence Against Women in Scotland (2000) writes:

"Discrimination against women who have had to divorce abusive clergy husbands (and whose status and right to church support is much less secure than that of clergy widows) must end … These should be matters of church policy and justice, and not left to piecemeal, inconsistent, case-by-case responses."

Survivors are torn when the church has responded to abuse by demoting their ex-husbands without providing financial support.

When Kylie told senior members in the Anglican Church what was happening, she says: "They listened to me, and my ex-husband is no longer in ministry."

But, she adds: "He emptied our bank account when I left so I had no access to income. Eventually I was able to find a low-paying job, though I'd really like to see the church think seriously about providing for families who are suddenly left with nothing because of their husband's abuse."

Jane, who spent decades working without pay in her husband's parish and raising young children, also wants the church to acknowledge their duty of care:

"The church needs to act … they have a responsibility to take care of these families. To make sure they're not going to be living in poverty like I'm living in. I worry about food every day, where is food going to come from?" What she wants most of all is retraining for the workforce.

Some churches have taken tentative steps to remedy this problem, most notably the Sydney Anglicans.

Their synod last month passed a motion asking its standing committee to create a "generously provisioned" long-term operating fund to assist clergy spouses and lay stipendiary workers left in financial hardship as a result of separation because of domestic abuse.

The motion, presented by Mark Tough, senior minister at St Clement's Anglican Church in Lalor Park, requested the fund be established "as a matter of urgency". The size and structure of the fund are yet to be determined.

Reverend Tough's motion asked the synod to acknowledge the church's responsibility to ensure ordination candidates are fit to enter — and then remain in — Holy Orders, as well as that, "A key reason why domestic abuse victims might find it difficult to separate from their spouses is because of potential financial hardship (especially where children are involved)".

He requested the standing committee — like the cabinet of the synod, or core governing body — ensure any funds allocated for abused clergy wives be distributed quickly.

Urgent. Generous. Quickly. This motion was passed without objection. Now the women are waiting to see what the Standing Committee decides.

This is the same committee that recently allocated $1 million of the Archbishop's discretionary funds to the unsuccessful No campaign against same-sex marriage, which infuriated them.

"I was very angry to hear that," says Kylie. "I was so disappointed, I thought about the women I know who don't have enough to eat, who can't feed their children, because they've been victims of abuse by clergy and what's the church doing for them?"

Sandy Grant dismisses the comparison between the $5,000 spent on the Domestic Violence Task Force and the million on the no campaign as "apples and oranges".

"As I said in my speeches to synod, at no stage, as chairman of that taskforce, has our work ever been inhibited by that funding and we're pleased to be able to get where we've got," he said.

"I'd say the value of the volunteer labour of the professionals, different capacities, who've served on the committee and advised the taskforce is incalculable. Our overall church response to domestic violence, of course, involves many millions."

'We have a responsibility to help'

It is crucial to understand that a group of priests — including some in Sydney, like Reverend Mark Tough in Lalor Park, Reverend Michael Jensen in Darling Point, Reverend Geoff Broughton in Paddington and Reverend Bruce Clarke in Manly — are doing important work in this area, and creating parishes where women are supported and listened to.

Each of them is eager for people to understand the church should be a place of safety, support and refuge, and survivors have begun seeking them out.

All of the women interviewed by ABC News had at least one positive experience with a member of clergy, some of which were fundamental to their survival.

At Jane's lowest point, she says a sympathetic priest saved her life.

"There was one particular pastor and his wife who were so instrumental in me leaving, they were there from day one, so supportive … they helped me pack, move, they provided food and meals and the biggest thing is that they turned around to me and said, 'We believe you'."

When well-meaning ministers meet abused women, often their perspective changes.

Reverend Tough said he asked the synod to consider providing financial assistance because he had witnessed firsthand the struggles of a clergy wife he had been helping.

"I discovered that she was experiencing financial hardship as a result of her separation and, in response to an enquiry that she made to the diocese, she was told that there was not much that the diocese could do for her," he said.

But when he asked the Archbishop what financial support was available to spouses of clergy who had separated due to domestic abuse, he was told only "limited" support could be offered, so he moved his motion at synod to set up a fund.

"I firmly believe that we as a diocese have a responsibility to help spouses in these awful circumstances because these abuses have occurred under our watch by people whom we deemed to be fit for office," he said.

Such initiatives are strongly supported by survivors and advocates like Isabella Young.

She also thinks there should be a church-funded rehabilitation program for abused clergy wives, especially given they, "have been encouraged to marry young and subvert their careers and desires to their husbands, to have multiple children and to work for free among their congregations".

They also get moved out of church housing "far too quickly", Ms Young says, "with little regard as to the unpaid service they have shown the church, the silence they have misguidedly held far too long for the sake of the church, or implicit 'goodness' that the church had imbued to their monstrous spouse by … not picking up on [his] character defects sooner".

Ms Young says these women are also torn between their desire to see justice for what has occurred and the fact that the more "fuss" they make about their abuse, "the less able their ex will be to pick up a job in a school or para-church organisation" and be able to provide child support.

"They shouldn't have to worry about that," she said.

What is also needed now, the women say, is strong cultural change, and a challenging of why "submission" has become such a core teaching in pockets of the church when it has been documented to enable violent men.

Kylie, who has spent much of her life in university Christian groups, bible colleges and parishes, says bluntly: "I really want the church to face up to the fact that this is actually a widespread problem, it's not the case of one or two bad apples, these men are coming out of a culture that has really almost trained them to be like that."

So what happened to the abusive priests in our case studies?

And how did the church discipline them, if at all?

There is no consistent pattern among denominations, though more are now being stood down, at least temporarily.

Two senior ministers in Jess's Presbyterian church referred to her husband's abuse as a, "communication problem with the use of force" that needed counselling.

Her husband was taken aside to discuss the matter with local leaders; her view was never sought. "Churches need to be aware that … it is easy for male perpetrators to continue to abuse when women are not given a voice, or believed," she said.

Emily's husband was stood down from ministry, but the reason the bishop gave for his demotion was not that he'd been abusive, she says, "but that he and I weren't likely to reconcile".

"At no point did the bishop or any of his staff check in on me to see if I was all right — no-one told me my ex-husband's behaviour was intolerable, and that they supported me," she said.

"The message I got was that I'd chosen to leave — that I had destroyed my husband's ministry and made him lose his job."

By the time Linda told a pastor at her Presbyterian church about her abuse, her husband had quit his ministry position.

The pastor told Linda it, "was okay to do what was best for her", but no action was ever taken against her abusive ex.

Some in her church community disapproved of her leaving her husband. Part of the problem, Linda believes, is the general lack of awareness in society about domestic violence.

Kate's Anglican priest ex-husband was also stood down when she told the hierarchy of his abuse. Not long after she'd left him, a fellow priest told her he'd been checking in on her ex, and that he was "suicidal" at the thought of losing her.

"I don't know if [the priest] was telling me because he felt I should be taking responsibility for my ex's mental state, or because he didn't know what else to say or how to help," Kate said.

"I now try to have compassion for that response — he was probably as lost as I was, sitting with the fact that a fellow priest had done this. Perhaps he didn't know what to believe, and was floundering."

Other priests since then have been wonderfully supportive and sensitive to Kate's needs as she works to rebuild her life and relearn trust.

"I am working with a brilliant and very skilful priest in trying to find a way to live with all this, and I am grateful for his ministry," she said.

"But it will be a long and painful process, one that I hope will make me a whole person again."

At the urging of her mother and some close friends, Lucy approached the leaders of her Pentecostal church and told them what had happened. She said the church leaders believed her, and told her they would cancel his credentials, though she never received any written confirmation of this.

(The website for the church where he continues to serve as pastor states that it is still affiliated with the denomination.)

Lucy has also been furious to discover other clergy wives have suffered abuse like her, and was devastated to learn many have since abandoned their faith because of it.

"These [abusive] men have nothing to do with God," she said. "They're evil men, they really are. And they're using Christianity and the bible to manipulate, control and abuse women and it's got to stop.

"Churches need to take [abused] women's voices very seriously. There should be options available to women — legal action or something — that overrides church leaders' power. It's just not good enough."

Even worse, the women say, the church knew all of this in 1990. And countless women have been abused since then.

All of the stories told to ABC News of rape, assault, tracking and control happened after the churches had been warned.

Most of the clergy interviewed by the ABC said only one thing had led to the recent flurry of apologies and reports in the past two years: women scraping together the courage to tell their stories.

'I hope you're somewhere, praying, praying'

Churchmen who assault clergy wives also damage their beliefs in what Kylie calls "a huge, sudden attack on our personal faith".

After she left her husband, she said, "I couldn't read the Bible anymore because I was hearing it in his voice, I'd look at the words and hear his voice speaking and it just put me back in that situation and it was too traumatic."

When Jane goes to church she has panic attacks. Emily is still part of a parish and says she is rediscovering her faith.

"There was a period during my marriage when I couldn't read my Bible at all, and I couldn't pray, because I was so angry that God would oblige me to remain in a situation that was so unliveable," she said.

"I was so furious at the advice of Christian leaders over the years to 'rejoice in suffering' and 'be content'."

When she did eventually pick up her Bible again, she said: "There were certain passages I couldn't read, particularly the verses about submission, which made me angry because they'd been used to keep me in my place for so long.

"My husband had told me I must submit to and obey him, but he ignored his responsibility to lay down his life for his wife.

"I've come to believe that submission in a marriage is not about dominating or demanding servitude; the gospel is not about being a law keeper, it's about grace, and a man — Jesus — who laid down his life for his enemies.

"It's about showing love to people who are broken, and so I always try to come back to that."

This is part of the debate about Kesha's song, Praying, that Jane loves so much.

Kesha has been involved in her own legal battles with a man she claims abused her for years; is she wrong to sing for someone's reform, to hope that they will fall on their knees and pray?

Is it sheer foolishness or grace? Or is she merely surprised to be discovering her own strength?

As the sun sets over the swing set in her backyard, and the neighbour's dogs bawl and bark, Jane is still dancing around the kitchen, grinning, singing, turning up the sound as loud as it will go.

I'm proud of who I am
No more monsters, I can breathe again
And you said that I was done
Well, you were wrong and now the best is yet to come...
I hope you're somewhere, praying, praying.

*The names of survivors have been changed for security and legal reasons.

This is part of an ABC News investigative series into religion and domestic violence. We are seeking to understand and report on cultural issues in faith communities that might impact on the behaviours of perpetrators of intimate partner violence and the responses of victims.

First, we looked at Islam. Then we focused on mainstream Protestant denominations, as well as the Catholic Church. Next, Judaism and Hinduism.

Other articles in this series

Exposing the darkness within: Islam and domestic violence

'Submit to your husbands': Women told to endure domestic violence in the name of God

Australian church leaders call for urgent response to domestic violence

Shattering the Silence: Australians tell their stories of surviving domestic violence in the Church

'Their cross to bear': The Catholic women told to forgive domestic abuse

Topics: domestic-violence, family-and-children, christianity, women, sexual-offences, australia

First posted