Raped, tracked, humiliated: Clergy wives speak out about domestic violence
Women
who were married to abusive priests are for the first time revealing
their experiences of sexual assault, control and fear. They say the
church has known for decades that some clergy abuse their wives but has
done very little to fix the ongoing problem.
It's not easy divorcing a priest, let alone a violent one.
Jane
has taken up smoking since she separated, wears more make-up and
listens to music at full volume — all of which would have intensely
irritated her ex-husband.
Rebellion has many guises; some self-destructive, others artless and unaffected.
On
a cool Spring afternoon in Sydney's outer suburbs, she stands in her
kitchen, turning up the volume to the song, Praying, Kesha's paean to
staring down — and surpassing — abusive men, and says, over and over, as
her feet slide in rhythm on the floor, "This is my song! It's mine.
This song is everything."
You brought the flames and you put me through hell I had to learn how to fight for myself And we both know all the truth I could tell I'll just say this: I wish you farewell
Days spent dancing are rare for Jane, though. Some weeks she drops her children to school then crawls back into bed, spent.
She
is on the single parent pension and regularly goes days without food.
But, just recently, she told 7.30 and ABC News, she has found her voice.
And, like other women who have spoken out about abuse in a sudden
recent spate of global assault allegations, she is determined.
When
she speaks of her faith in God, her face shines. When she speaks of the
violence she experienced at the hands of her husband, a senior Anglican
priest who worked in a series of parishes across Australia, she
trembles.
And when she speaks of the response of the church to her plight, her jaw sets in anger.
Every night of her 20-year marriage, Jane's husband
would wake her up several times for sex. If she objected, he would wait
until she fell asleep again.
"He was very sexually abusive from the start," she said.
"He
would watch pornography, drink heavily, and come to bed. I would wake
up with him touching me, inside me and I'd say to him, 'Stop I'm
pregnant' or 'I'm really tired' and he would just wait until I fell back
to sleep and continue. He knew how much it upset me.
"If I said
'no' during sex or 'no I don't want to do that', he would get angry and
sulk. And so it was better for me to give in than to have to put up with
that.
"Or he would get angry with the kids, so if I gave him sex he wouldn't get angry. Therefore the kids wouldn't cop the abuse.
Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume.
The young mother became sleep deprived and
exhausted. Finally, she decided she could not continue to cater to her
husband's needs at the expense of her own health.
"I actually went
to him one night and I said 'I need a break from our sexual
relationship ... and we need to work on our marriage'. He said: 'I'm
here for you, you have my support', and then he proceeded to rape me.
"He took what he wanted. And I think he knew in his mind it was one of the last times that he could have me."
Jane
was devastated by the assault. She became deeply depressed, stopped
eating and had a breakdown: "I was very unwell for about a year, I
really struggled with everything."
Her husband even confessed his
sins to a member of the church hierarchy, who told Jane that, if it was
true, she should report him to police. But, Jane says, the clergy
member did not offer her any support.
A year later, she left her husband for good.
Abuse of clergy wives covered up and ignored
Jane is part of a private online support group of Anglican clergy wives in New South Wales who were abused by their husbands.
They
message each other or speak most days, providing a sympathetic ear or
suggesting new counsellors when things are desperate.
What
stunned them when they first met for dinner were two things. First, how
many of them there were, and how common and continuing this problem
seemed to be.
Second were the similarities in their experiences:
after committing their lives to supporting their husband's ministry,
each had been forced to leave after decades of emotional, financial and
sexual abuse which had left them depressed, fearful and, for some,
suicidal.
Several had been part of Moore Theological College in
Sydney — the training seminary of the Anglican Diocese of Sydney — when
their husbands studied to be priests. All had mixed experiences with the
church after disclosing their abuse: some clergy had supported them and
pleaded their cases, while others ignored them.
All had disappointing or bruising experiences with a senior church leader when they asked for help.
It
has been a year since they found each other, a year spent submitting
police reports, talking for hours, struggling to pay bills and seeing
psychologists. And they now also share a common anger.
They claim
to have been silenced, their abuse covered up and their experiences
ignored by a hierarchy that, they say, continues to see domestic
violence as a peripheral female problem.
Several months ago, an investigation by 7.30 and ABC News revealed
women in Christian communities were being told to endure or forgive
domestic violence, and stay in abusive relationships, often due to
misappropriation of Bible verses on submission.
Since then,
hundreds of women — a number of whom were clergy wives from different
denominations across Australia — have contacted us to tell their stories.
Many
did so out of frustration that some church leaders had responded to
reports of domestic violence with denial, demanding urgent response.
In recent weeks, the national and Sydney
Anglican churches have formally apologised to survivors of domestic
violence in their ranks, and even confessed some clergy were
perpetrators.
The problem is this: the Australian church knew
this was happening decades ago — that it was not just rogue parishioners
who were abusing their spouses, but its leaders, too. And very little
has been done to fix it.
The
most detailed report of sexual violence among Australian clergy cannot
be easily found online, nor in any church offices. No-one seems to have
heard of it.
But buried in a back room of the Queen Victoria
Women's Centre, a striking red brick building which sits in a grove of
mirrored towers in Melbourne's CBD, rests a series of incendiary reports
published in the 1990s.
Contained in them are warnings to the
church that some members of its clergy were being violent to their
spouses and families, and that this merited urgent action.
The
archives belong to the Centre Against Sexual Assault (CASA House), part
of the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne, which conducted seminal
research on violence in the church.
The first publication, The
Pastoral Report to the Churches on Sexual Violence Against Women and
Children in the Church Community, was produced in 1990 in collaboration
with the Catholic Church, Anglican Church, Churches of Christ, Uniting
Church and Salvation Army.
It found some clergymen had sexually
assaulted women in their families (as well as parishioners), and it
recommended bishops and administrators in religious organisations act.
"The
painful reality that clergy are involved in criminal activity can no
longer be ignored and protocol is urgently needed in response to these
acts where sexual violence ... is perpetrated against clergy wives and
children," the report stated.
Then,
in 1994, in consultation with the Anglican Diocese of Melbourne, CASA
published Public Face, Private Pain: The Anglican Report About Violence
Against Women and the Abuse of Power within the Church Community.
They
reported women were suffering physical and emotional abuse "in
silence": 9 per cent had been abused by clergymen. More than half had
experienced sexual violence — at 58 per cent, significantly higher than
any other form of abuse.
One woman said: "My husband won't let me
have the housekeeping money unless we have sex". Another woman was
hospitalised after decades of "consistent forced intercourse".
Crucially,
the women interviewed stated "unanimously" that it was more difficult
to report abuse when a priest was involved. When they did, "They were
often bitterly disappointed and disillusioned at the response of
authorities".
The women worried about damaging "the public image
of the men" and upsetting the congregation. Many made the choice to
remain silent rather than risk backlash from the church.
According
to the report: "[T]his concern was reasonable given the experiences of
many women who were stigmatised when they did disclose to church
leaders."
What church leaders needed to understand, the report
found, was that this was criminal behaviour. They needed to stop using
euphemisms like "marriage breakdown" and "relationship difficulties" to
describe violence against women.
Troublingly, churches had
frequently responded to complaints against clergy of sexual or other
violence by simply moving offenders to different parishes, states or
roles within the church, such as "administration or pastoral positions,
for example, industrial chaplaincy or youth ministry".
The
researchers strongly condemned this practice: "Ministers of the church
are representatives of God's love, which is about trust, service,
healing, leadership and respect for the vulnerable. Sexual violence
perpetrated by a church leader … should have serious and long-term
consequences regarding their status as a priest."
Barbara Roberts, leader of the website A Cry for Justice,
created for Christian survivors of domestic violence, said this is a
familiar pattern: "Abusive ministers may be quietly urged to move
churches or move into administrative roles by their colleagues who are
aware of the allegations of abuse."
Another concern arises, Ms
Roberts said, in denominations where, "they can still enable a corrupt
clergyman to continue abusing by giving him a reference which fails to
disclose the allegations that had been made against him".
According
to clergy wives interviewed by the ABC, in the 27 years since the CASA
reports were published, very little has changed.
Rebecca says
priests have been moved from parish to parish or from rectory to
chaplaincy or schools: "There are a number of cases where the abusive
clergyman has been stood down for a time. I don't see that it's ever
permanent and I think often it's just swept under the rug, pushed on for
someone else to deal with as was the case in my circumstance."
Life as the wife of a priest, the 'face of the church'
Being
the wife of a priest or pastor is a particular, exacting job. It
requires a lot of sacrifice: to your husband, the church and the demands
of the parish.
It is work that, while deemed holy, requires a great deal of commitment, devotion and patience with long hours and odd demands.
It
is also unpaid, a fact that leaves many wives vulnerable if their
marriages end. Out of the workforce sometimes for decades and still
caring for children, they can find themselves without a house (they will
need to leave the rectory) or without any income (if their husband
loses his job due to his abuse, finances are instantly precarious).
But,
according to Jess, who was married to a Presbyterian minister, clergy
wives are discouraged from "selfishly" pursuing a career.
Some
women feel trapped because, as Jane says, expectations on clergy
families to be role models as "the face of the church" are high.
"We
were taught through the church you always speak highly of your husband.
And you obey him, you're submissive, you ask permission to do things,
and that was my life." Seeking help, she said, was hard.
Others found the higher their husbands climbed, the greater the risk of abuse.
Jess
said: "The more power he gained in a ministerial position, the more
rigid and emotionally dominating he became. He didn't like confident
women and wanted to see them submit. He used physical force during
arguments, like grabbing my face, neck, [putting his] hand over my mouth
and nose.
"He told me that behaviour was necessary and I had brought it on myself as I had raised my voice or shown contempt for him."
Formerly married to an abusive Anglican priest
I met my ex-husband through the church: I was young, and he was an ordained priest who challenged my intellect.
I
struggle to articulate how he was back then because I can't see it
uncoloured by later experiences. But he was intelligent, friendly,
boyish and very much able to hide some of the darker aspects of who he
is.
At first his abuse shocked me — it was such a contrast to the
atmosphere of quiet respect and love I had grown up in, and I'd naively
try to use the peacemaking techniques I learned as a child to smooth
volatile situations.
I was also living away from family (we
regularly moved between parishes and dioceses) and had been effectively
isolated from anyone who loved me — it was therefore much easier for him
to set himself up as the centre of my world, to tell me that he was the
only one who really knew me, and that if others knew me as he did
they'd treat me in a similar way.
His abusive behaviour was initially indistinguishable from his anger about his troubles at work.
He
blamed and lashed out at me for things that went wrong for him
professionally, but I tried to be understanding and took responsibility
for my "share" of arguments.
In hindsight, though, I can see I was just making excuses for his verbal abuse.
His
tirades became worse when he drank, which meant that, if things were
calm because he wasn't drinking as much, he was able to stand behind
alcohol rather than take responsibility for his behaviour.
He
became physically abusive early on in our marriage, but by that time I
was so deeply bound up in my own sense of fault that I was convinced
that I deserved it.
Generally, it was low-level assaults —
pushing, slapping, punching — inflicted in such a way that injuries were
not obvious: a punch to the middle of my back whilst I was sleeping,
for instance.
He also raped me. I couldn't fight, I couldn't stop
it, so I went away in my head, waited until it was over, and got on
with things.
But for me, the sexual abuse — and the shame I still carry as a result — was worse.
To
be raped — held down and assaulted, helpless against superior physical
strength — is something that no woman should ever experience.
However,
for me the sexual coercion was in many ways worse. To remain
physically, emotionally, spiritually safe, I co-operated when I did not
want to. It was sex for safety: a form of prostitution with a different
currency.
I carry more shame over that than anything else.
His
abuse grew worse when I started working out of the home, I believe
because I was moving beyond his control and sphere of influence.
His
physical violence increased gradually, over several years, with more
overt assaults and smaller periods of relative calm between them.
Eventually he was verbally, emotionally and physically abusing me every night.
It
got to the point where he stopped trying to ensure he was giving me
only discreet injuries and it became too dangerous to stay; I knew there
was a very real chance that one of the assaults could kill me.
When
I left after a particularly vicious physical attack, I'd been planning
it for a while, speaking with a real estate agent and making other
arrangements.
When I told a close friend what was happening, and that I was planning to leave my ex, he just said: "Good".
That was all, but it was the strongest reinforcement he could have given me that it was the right thing to do.
I
know that many women take several attempts to leave, so in that sense I
feel a strange sense of relief that the situation became so extreme
that the choice was forced on me.
I left the relationship with
enough money to cover half the bond for a flat, a suitcase full of
clothes and a teddy bear whose arm my ex had pulled off (my first
priority was to have him invisibly mended).
Had it not been for the generosity of my family, I could potentially have left into homelessness.
Since then I have tried to be open about what has happened to me.
Quite
soon after leaving, a fellow priest told me that my ex was suicidal at
the idea of losing me, and that he had been following up with him.
I
don't know if he was telling me because he felt I should be taking
responsibility for my ex's mental state, or because he didn't know what
else to say or how to help.
I now try to have compassion for that
response — he was probably as lost as I was, sitting with the fact that
a fellow priest had done this. Perhaps he didn't know what to believe,
and was floundering.
In fact, one of the things I struggle with
most is the sense of shame and defensiveness I feel when people find out
my ex is a priest.
I feel like I need to defend all the good and
decent priests out there who wouldn't dream of raising their hand to
another person.
Rightly or wrongly, I also think the Royal
Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse has
created a culture of fear within the church, which in some ways has made
it difficult for church leaders to acknowledge how they could have
responded differently to victims of abuse.
The church hierarchy
has done its best to acknowledge what happened to me, but I also think
they simply don't know how to create a safe space communally where
victims are upheld respectfully.
At times this has made it
difficult for us as a church community to discuss how we handle abuse —
there is such heightened emotion and fear around it.
Having said
that, some priests have shown care and concern in a sensitive way: they
have been honest with me about not knowing what to say or how to help,
or their senses of horror or guilt or sorrow.
Today, I hold down a
demanding schedule and a job that requires lots of attention and
emotional energy, and I manage to function reasonably well in an adult
world.
I don't use alcohol or drugs to mask symptoms or feelings,
and I am surrounded by wonderful people with whom I maintain healthy
relationships.
I'm content with being single and I have re-learned to be comfortable with my own company.
I
know that I'm doing "well", but beneath the surface, I think I will
always be damaged — physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually —
by what happened.
I still struggle to trust others and I often feel deeply uncomfortable with touch, even from those I love with all my heart.
I
have worked hard to re-learn safety but it feels tenuous, and I still
live with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, especially
jumpiness, anxiety, nightmares and a tendency to retreat or dissociate
when I feel unsafe or under attack.
I don't know whether I'll ever be free of the huge sense of shame he left me with.
I
am working with a brilliant and very skilful priest in trying to find a
way to live with all this, and I am grateful for his ministry, but it
will be a long and painful process — one that I hope will make me a
whole person again.
Despite everything I have experienced, and
the massive impact it has had on my spirituality, I still identify as a
Christian, although my image of the Divine is not set in stone; perhaps I
could describe myself as an agnostic Christian.
These days I
find the expression of my spirituality in the ritual and music of the
church, and its loving and accepting community. My faith is my home.
Formerly married to an abusive Anglican minister
I met my ex-husband at church, when I was young. He was a friendly, quiet, bookish type, and he struck me as a gentle man.
He
seemed to really like my social and outgoing side and I loved our
intellectual connection; we dated for a few years before we got married.
But right from the start there were problems with our relationship.
Any
kind of conflict made him uncomfortable and if we argued or I tried to
raise issues I was unhappy about — for example, how little housework he
was doing — he'd withdraw, and wouldn't speak to me for days at a time.
He
tried to excuse his behaviour as inexperience; he'd say he hadn't grown
up around conflict and therefore I needed to back off and not challenge
him, so that's what I did.
Over time, I learned to be very passive with him — I'd do anything to avoid upsetting him.
Early in our marriage he began a ministry training course, and later enrolled at a ministry training college in Sydney.
I
was happy for him to pursue his vocation; he was very passionate about
his work and he was clearly gifted — he'd immerse himself in theological
textbooks and could communicate the things he learned well.
Life
as a ministry wife was busy: we'd regularly host bible studies,
meetings, lessons, and training sessions in our home, and I'd often hold
fort and take care of the kids while he wrote sermons or disappeared to
church or other appointments.
We also moved around a lot, and
while I loved the friendships I made at our various churches, it was
hard being away from my family, and at times it felt like our life was
all about chasing his dreams, not mine.
Perhaps the hardest thing about being a ministry wife, though, was having to pretend everything was all right.
In
public, I'd have to plaster a smile on my face and try to be a "good
ministry wife", when actually things at home were awful.
He could be quite engaging in public, and presented the image of an affectionate, involved family man.
But
behind closed doors he had slowly begun checking out, and distancing
himself from family life. He was withdrawn, moody, and incredibly
controlling.
He logged how many kilometres I drove and how much
money I spent — I had to ask permission before I bought anything worth
more than $50.
I also agreed to install a tracker on my phone and
he would insist I turn it on whenever I went out without him. He
convinced me it was appropriate, that it was good for me to "be
accountable" to him and to God.
He accused me of having an
affair, which I wasn't, and confiscated my phone in order to read all my
messages and social media inboxes to make sure I wasn't having
"inappropriate" relationships with other men.
My attempts to discuss my concerns were always met with: "You're being unreasonable. Your expectations are too high."
He excused his bad behaviour as depression, and reminded me of my vows to love him in sickness and in health.
He also used headship theology to justify his abuse: he'd tell me that, as his wife, I just needed to be more obedient.
Of
another couple we knew who were having problems, he said: "No matter
how bad things get, she has to submit to him — even if he's not
upholding his vows."
Towards the end, he was regularly losing his
temper and exploding with rage, shouting at me — and our children — for
trivial things.
If I did something to upset him, he'd rant and rave and kick furniture; one night he put his fist through a wall.
And
while I never saw him hurt the kids, he was rough with them. I didn't
feel like I was able to leave them in his care, even for small amounts
of time.
If I ever went out by myself, he'd often call or text
and ask me to come home because he didn't feel like he could handle them
and was "afraid" of what he might do to them.
I considered
leaving several times, but I never felt I could — I told myself I just
had to stick it out, that this was the life I'd chosen.
At one
point he had a major depressive episode and was sleeping in a different
bedroom — he'd stopped touching me and talking to me, which was painful
and hard.
But when I tried to help him, or just talk to him about
what was going on, he'd accuse me of putting pressure on him and trying
to make him feel guilty.
I remember saying to him: "I'm not coping, my work is suffering, I'm physically ill and I'm having nightmares about you."
He said I'd just have to figure out how to love him "better".
"You should feel lucky that I don't hit you," he said on a number of occasions.
After a particularly bad weekend, I decided things had to change.
His
abuse had been getting progressively worse, and I wasn't coping with
the constant tension, the monitoring, the feeling as though my every
move was being criticised, and the sure knowledge that he didn't care
how his behaviour was affecting me — I just needed to get away.
So I packed some bags for me and the children and went and stayed with my family for a while.
I
also reached out to the senior minister at church, who had no idea what
had been going on. When I told him, I dissolved. There were so many
phone calls where I'd just be sobbing uncontrollably down the line to
him.
It took him a while to grasp how bad the situation was, but
he was incredibly supportive and made it clear that my safety was his
first priority, and that he'd never ask me to go back if I didn't feel
safe (I didn't).
But he was also very optimistic about us reconciling, and hoped we'd sort things out.
While
I appreciated his encouragement, it would have been easier for me if
he'd been educated about the dynamics of domestic abuse, and how best to
respond.
Pushing us into marriage counselling, for example, was
really unhelpful — it just gave my ex-husband another avenue to
manipulate me, control the narrative and convince the counsellor that I
was an unreasonable, "crazy" woman.
Importantly, my ex-husband
was stood down from his ministerial duties, and has not been reinstated
(he still does some church ministry, but in an unpaid capacity).
However,
the reason the bishop gave for his demotion was not that he'd been
abusive, but that he and I weren't likely to reconcile.
At no
point did the bishop or any of his staff check in on me to see if I was
all right; no-one told me my ex-husband's behaviour was intolerable, and
that they supported me.
The message I got was that I'd chosen to
leave, and was choosing not to return — that I had destroyed my
husband's ministry and made him lose his job.
Life since I left
has been, for the most part, wonderful. My children and I are settled in
a new home, and we're attending the church I grew up in.
But the
necessary ongoing communication with my ex-husband is a source of
stress. As much as I try to keep the peace, he regularly accuses me of
being unreasonable, which can be triggering.
I often second-guess
myself: I think, am I really as horrible and disrespectful as he tells
me I am? Is there really something wrong with me?
Still, I feel
lucky that I've never really suffered from depression or anxiety — I
keep in touch with other women in the church who've experienced domestic
violence and I seem to have gotten through everything without the
long-term trauma that some of them suffer daily.
I am also rediscovering my faith.
There
was a period during my marriage when I couldn't read my Bible at all,
and I couldn't pray, because I was so angry that God would oblige me to
remain in a situation that was so unliveable.
I was so furious at the advice of Christian leaders over the years to "rejoice in suffering" and "be content".
When
I did eventually pick up my Bible again, though, there were certain
passages I couldn't read, particularly the verses about submission,
which made me angry because they'd been used to keep me in my place for
so long.
My husband had told me I must submit to and obey him, but he ignored his responsibility to lay down his life for his wife.
I've
come to believe that submission in a marriage is not about dominating
or demanding servitude; the gospel is not about being a law keeper, it's
about grace, and a man — Jesus — who laid down his life for his
enemies.
It's about showing love to people who are broken, and so I always try to come back to that.
Formerly married to an abusive Presbyterian pastor
About three months into their marriage, Linda's ex-husband slapped her in the face during an argument.
His
behaviour towards his Catholic-raised wife had changed dramatically as
soon as they'd gotten married; previously a man who came across as laid
back and charming, he'd become difficult and aggressive towards her,
critical of her, strict with money, and frequently accused her of
"provoking him" to anger.
Having never experienced anything like
it, Linda was shocked, and set her boundary then and there: "I told him
that if he ever did that again, it would be over, I would leave."
For
all the decades they were married, he never once hit her again, but
often threatened to — by raising his hand, telling her she deserved to
be hit — perhaps because she'd asked him to water a dying house plant,
or because she'd neglected to clean a dusty picture rail.
"When
we moved into our little house he told me that I had to look after him
like his mother did," Linda said. "And everybody says to me now,
'Doesn't that say leave right there?'"
But because of my Catholic upbringing" — her commitment to her marriage vows — "I couldn't".
A few years later, her husband — who had never been religious — became interested in Christianity.
He
did an outreach course and started going regularly to a local
independent Baptist church, before deciding to join the leadership. He
became a deacon, then an elder (then later moved to a Presbyterian
church, where he was an assistant pastor).
At first Linda was
supportive of his vocation (she thought it might help him work through
some of his personal issues) and became heavily involved in the church
community herself, as a youth group leader as well as contributing to
various other church initiatives.
But his aggression and attempts
to control her grew worse, which she partly attributes to the church's
teaching on male headship, and his demands that she submit to and obey
him in everything.
"The teaching in those churches was so heavily
about women's submission," she said. "It became pivotal to our
relationship — his happiness depended on my complete and utter
submission."
(She recently found an old copy of a Christian
women's magazine, which suggested wives, "imagine submission as your
husband holding a broom, like you're [playing] limbo. If he puts the
broom really close to the ground, you have to keep bending over
backwards until you're crawling on the ground, if that is what he wants
you to do".)
Linda's husband became increasingly emotionally
abusive and his criticisms more frequent: her appearance, her parenting,
how much money she spent, how long she took in the supermarket.
He told her he didn't want their kids to grow up to be like her, that her own parents had failed in raising her.
"The
house was never clean enough, the children were never tidy or quiet
enough, everything had to be controlled and subdued," she said.
"He
was at the same time telling me I was socially awkward, that if he died
I would never be able to find another husband because I wasn't young
anymore. I felt utterly worthless."
"If I would disagree with him,
he'd say to me, 'I'd be better off living on the roof than with a
contentious woman', which is a proverb from the old testament."
(Proverbs 25:24: "Better to live on a corner of the roof than share a
house with a quarrelsome wife.")
He was also harsh with — and sometimes physically abusive towards — their children.
"He
dragged [my son] up the hallway by his ear and he kicked him up the
stairs," she said. "I'd jump in the middle [between him and them] and
say, 'You have to hit me first' because I knew — and he knew — that if
he hit me, I'd be gone."
But at church, standing up the front,
leading worship and prayer, he was an entirely different man:
"Incredibly charismatic, engaging, humble, happy. The complete opposite
of what I lived with."
Linda felt trapped. "To leave him [would have been] a sin … and no-one would have believed me [that he was abusive].
"I
was suicidal … I would be driving and I just wanted to take my hands
off the steering wheel. I would just say to myself, 'It will all be
over'," she said.
"But I couldn't do that to my children … And so
you just sort of keep on going, but you're dying inside. It's like
you're a shell of a person just going through the motions."
Her
husband — then still an assistant pastor at the Presbyterian church —
felt he wasn't getting the acknowledgment he deserved. He wanted to be
preaching more, playing a bigger role.
But when he wasn't given the recognition he desired, Linda said, he resigned, and left the church altogether.
At
home, his behaviour had become more "frightening". He was always
yelling at her, throwing things and picking fights with the children,
who'd begun to question and stand up to his "hypocritical" behaviour.
So she started seeing a psychologist, who helped her realise she was in an abusive marriage.
She
also sought counselling from another pastor at the church who told her
it was okay to do what was best for her, which she is grateful for.
Eventually
she asked her husband to move out, and he did. But navigating the
response from others at her church, many of whom disapproved of her
leaving him, was difficult.
Part of the problem, she believes, is the general lack of awareness in society that domestic abuse comes in many guises.
"We
used to think abuse was only physical. But I actually think emotional
abuse is worse because with physical abuse you know that people are
going to believe you because they can see it — and you can see it as
well."
But with emotional abuse, she said, "You think, 'Am I that weak? How pathetic am I, get a grip, woman — you're stronger than this'. So you do a lot of self-talk, but the attacks come back again and you're pulled back down."
Today, Linda is married to "an amazing man" who has been "very patient" with her ups and downs.
She
suffers from the symptoms of PTSD, and is still recovering from a raft
of stress-related ailments, including chronic fatigue.
She also finds it difficult to leave the house, but sees a counsellor regularly.
"I'm
spending hundreds of dollars on vitamins, nutrition, and therapy [every
month] just so I can function," she said. "I can't work, I can't hold
down a job and haven't been able to for years."
But while she has
managed to maintain a quiet, personal faith, she no longer attends
church. When she has tried to go in the past, she said, "I've had the
biggest panic attacks and it's just not worth it".
Instead? "I just read my Bible and leave it at that."
Formerly married to an abusive Pentecostal pastor
Lucy met her ex-husband through a friend when she was in her late 20s, while she was on a holiday.
He
was much older than her, and divorced, but so sweet and charming, and
they soon hit it off. A girl from the country, she was "young, insecure
and naive" and "desperate to get married" and he in turn was quick to
ask for her hand.
"We were engaged within a week or two," Lucy
said. "I just got totally immersed in getting married, a young girl's
dream of a wedding."
From very early on in their relationship,
though — before her husband became a pastor in a Pentecostal church — he
tried to control her.
"I look back and there were alarm bells
ringing everywhere" — even on their honeymoon, Lucy said, when they had a
terrible fight.
"I can remember sitting in the car thinking, 'Oh
my goodness, I have to go home, my marriage is over and I'm on my
honeymoon'. It was that bad. I thought, 'What have I done?'"
Lucy's
husband demanded to know how many sexual partners she'd had, and
accused her of lying when she told him she was a virgin.
He'd
listen in on her phone calls to family, and order her to hang up if he
thought she'd been talking for too long with girlfriends. If she went to
take the dog for a walk, he'd insist on coming, and if she asked to go
by herself, he'd be angry with her for the rest of the day.
He'd
regularly come home in a foul mood, which would fester until he
exploded, and then he'd carry on at her for hours, while she cried,
wishing he'd just leave her alone.
He was also secretive about the
medication he was taking, concealing the fact he was addicted to
antidepressants and painkillers, which he told her he'd begun using
after his first marriage broke down.
And he was terrible with
money. Early on Lucy worked out he "could not be trusted" with a joint
savings account — he'd tell her he had "no idea" where the money would
go — so she made sure to put away enough to cover rent and the upkeep of
their car.
The sexual abuse was the hardest. It began on their
honeymoon when, despite Lucy's tears and pleas that he stop because she
was in so much pain, he kept going.
If she had her period, or —
as was the case on many occasions — a urinary tract infection, he'd get
angry, "because he would know there'd be no sex for a week".
He'd
tell her sex was his "right" — that the Bible said she should not
refuse or deny him sex "unless for prayer", and so she would comply.
Partly
because of his size, sex for her was painful, but he would regularly
joke that she should "have an operation" so she could better accommodate
him.
She came to dread sex, and the pain and humiliation it
caused her, though often agreed to it because she "didn't want the
fight".
This was the case on one of the last times they were
intimate, when he ignored her tears and kept going, with even greater
force, until she finally pushed him off and got up, in excruciating
pain.
"He'd actually split me," she said. "I was bleeding, and crying my eyes out."
The abuse escalated over the years they were married until Lucy realised she was "falling apart" and needed a break.
She was crying all the time — at the supermarket, in the shower — and was regularly overcome by panic attacks.
"I
was suicidal, I just hated my life," she said. "I was taking pills for
migraines, and I wanted to swallow them all just to sleep. I wanted it
over."
At one of the few counselling sessions she attended (a
handful were with her ex-husband, but she said he resented being there
and disliked it when the counsellor didn't "take his side") she was
shown the 'cycle of abuse' diagram describing the types and nature of
domestic abuse.
"When I saw it written in front of me, I just cried and cried, because I knew that was happening [to me] every time," she said.
"I
knew we were building up to a fight … and then it would be the
'buyback' phase, and then the flowers ... and then it would cruise and
build again … it set me free to know it was a real thing."
Eventually, she packed a bag and left for a friend's place in a different state, where she stayed for a few weeks.
Her
husband told her the church was "cutting her off" financially, and that
if she was going to leave him, she should just leave. His mother
demanded Lucy come and pick up her things.
Despite Lucy's efforts
to "keep the peace" until she could organise a divorce, he continued to
send her abusive texts, and refused to give her any money or a share in
their car, which he said he needed, "to do the Lord's work".
She
was broke, and broken. "I kept thinking I should ring my solicitor to
change my will, because I thought I'd kill myself," she said. "And I
didn't want him getting anything."
At the urging of her mother and
some close friends, Lucy approached the leaders of her church and told
them what had happened, except for the details of his sexual abuse,
which she felt too ashamed of and embarrassed about to share.
She
said the church leaders believed her, and told her they would cancel
his credentials, though she never received any written confirmation that
they had. (The website for the church where he continues to serve as
pastor states that the church is still affiliated with the
denomination.)
Lucy's divorce was finalised a couple of years ago,
and she has since found a new partner — a kind and compassionate man
who she says takes wonderful care of her.
Her faith has played a
huge role in her healing, and she strongly believes women in the church
suffering abuse shouldn't give up their faith.
"I believe in God
and have seen God's goodness, [for example] sending me the right
counsellors … These [abusive] men have nothing to do with God — they're
evil men, they really are. And they're using Christianity and the Bible
to manipulate, control and abuse women and it's got to stop.
"I
was so glad when [ABC News] said a lot of people had come forward [to
share their stories] because we have to come forward and be strong and
[say] 'no'. We have a right to be who we are."
She also believes it's important to speak out about her abuse so others might come forward.
"Churches need to take [abused] women's voices very seriously," she said.
"There
should be options available to women — legal action or something — that
overrides church leaders' power. It's just not good enough."
It is rare for children to be unaffected by domestic abuse, and many times they, too are targets.
Jane's
husband disciplined their kids with his hands and sticks. When she
tried to intervene, she would bear the blunt brunt of his anger: "[I]t
was scary."
Rebecca did not want to leave her children alone with her Anglican pastor husband.
"I
witnessed a lot of abuse of the kids that left me in tears, and just
terrified," she said. "[I saw] him throwing the kids, pushing them,
pulling them, smothering them … locking my children outside with no
clothes on in the middle of winter at night because they wouldn't go to
sleep. That was their punishment."
The danger, says Jane, comes when men claim full authority over their wives.
"Men,
when they're given that amount of control, tend to abuse. If they know
their wife has to obey what they want, then how easy is it for them to
say, 'All I want you to do is do this, you have to do that, you have to
have sex with me'? You know there's no accountability with these men."
Isabella
Young (not her real name), an Anglican survivor who is writing a book
on domestic violence in the church, says the problem is made worse when
the congregation is not informed of the reasons for a ministry couple
separating or leaving their church, which allows, "a cloud of ambiguity
to form as to what was going on in the marriage".
"There is frequently no impression given that any serious transgressions have occurred," Ms Young said.
This
strips the wife of potential support she could have in the
congregation: "In abusive ministry marriages, the cloud frequently forms
over the wife's reputation but it also allows the abuser an escape
without appropriate consequences.
"I'm tired of hearing how
pastors who are abusive to their wives, frequently meting out such abuse
in the presence of their children and are sometimes directly abusive
towards their children, are not publicly held to account."
This,
she added, "has unfortunate consequences in that some [pastors] are
subsequently employed in para-church organisations or … schools, without
their employers being any the wiser as to their true character."
Teaching of submission 'enables' abusive men
Every one of the clergy wives who spoke to 7.30 and ABC News claimed the teaching of submission contributed to their abuse.
The verses usually cited for this doctrine are Ephesians 5:22-24:
"Wives,
submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of
the wife, just as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which
he is the Saviour. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives
should submit to their husbands."
The verses are
intended, according to those who teach them, to be about (male)
sacrificial love and (female) voluntary submission.
But in practice, these women say, it can mean an entirely different thing.
Rebecca winced when her Anglican pastor husband gave sermons on the subject.
"He
preached about a husband loving his wife as Christ loved the church but
I didn't see that at home," she said. "But he preached about submission
and I heard it my whole life: that that's what a wife did, and that's
what I believed was my role as his wife. I think I understood it to mean
I had to be quiet."
The use of the word "submit", Rebecca says,
is, "unhelpful when there's such an abuse problem in the church, I think
it enables abusers and keeps victims within an abusive marriage".
The
focus on submission is more pronounced in some quarters of the
Australian church, usually those that have male-only priesthoods
(meaning women should submit both at home and at church).
When
Kylie met her "charming" Anglican husband, for example, they were both
involved in "conservative, fundamentalist Christian circles" with a
heavy emphasis on male 'headship' and female 'submission'.
At her
university Christian group, she was taught that if she wanted to marry:
"I should make sure it was to a man I could submit to and trust
completely, as after we were married he would be the one to 'lead' and
make all of the decisions for the family."
When she fell in love
with a charismatic man, she agreed to follow this model of marriage. But
what she did not expect to have to submit to was petty, controlling,
emotionally abusive behaviour that escalated over time:
"There
was one time when I hadn't folded the laundry and put it away and he
threw it out of the house and said it was cluttering up the living area
and when I went out to get it, he told me I couldn't sleep in the house
that night because I'd been a disobedient wife. He'd made it clear he
didn't want the laundry in the house and I'd defied him and brought it
back in. It didn't ever occur to me that this was unreasonable of him."
Slowly
Kylie sank under the weight of household duties and postnatal
depression, believing it would be inappropriate to ask for help.
"The
church and college told me it was my role to carry the burden at home
so he could focus on ministry, and that asking for more from him would
be sinful.
"I believe many of the college's teachings — on wifely
submission, for instance — laid the groundwork for men to treat their
wives badly. As a ministry wife I was also told by the college that it
was my job to give my husband sex whenever he wanted, any time of the
day or night."
Her husband began to encourage her to leave,
telling her he and their children would be better off if she wasn't
around. Kylie began to wonder if he might be right, and contemplated
suicide.
Then, one morning, when she was preparing to leave him,
her husband raped her. When she tells the story, she grows pale and
starts to shake.
"I tried to stop him, but my children were in the
next room, I didn't want to make a loud noise because they were right
there listening. I didn't know what to do it was really unexpected and I
just tried to push him off and close my legs and stop it happening but I
couldn't."
A short time later, she went to the police.
'Your job is to give your husband sex whenever he wants it'
One
of the striking similarities in the stories of these women is the
prevalence of rape. For many, the question of consent was blurry.
It took several years, for example, before Rebecca realised what her husband, an Anglican priest, was doing was wrong.
"I was forced to do things I didn't feel comfortable with," she said.
"He
would hurt me physically when we had sex and I feared sometimes when he
strangled me when we were having sex that I would pass out. It
genuinely terrified me that he wouldn't know when to stop. I didn't know
if I would die."
Rebecca told 7.30 she had been taught that if
she loved her husband she would submit to him in all things, so she
endured the pain.
"I felt like it was how I could submit to him,
and give into his desires and his needs. That was my way of loving him
and honouring him."
It was not until she confided in a friend that
she realised what was happening. "She said that wasn't right, she
looked it up online to show me I was actually being raped. That was a
real eye opener for me that what was happening in our marriage was, in
fact, illegal."
Formerly married to an abusive Anglican minister
When
I met my ex-husband we were both involved in conservative,
fundamentalist Christian circles. There was a lot of teaching about male
'headship' and female 'submission'.
I was brought up in that world and believed it was God's pattern for men and women.
During
my time at university I was taught in the Christian group that if I
wanted to be married, I should make sure it was to a man I could submit
to and trust completely, as after we were married he would be the one to
'lead' and make all of the decisions for the family.
My ex was
very charming, intelligent and attractive and I was quiet and shy. He
gave me the impression that a lot of girls were in love with him, so I
felt flattered that he paid any attention to me and quickly fell in
love.
There were a couple of times during our engagement when he
was very controlling, but he made it clear that if I didn't "submit" he
would break it off, and I was afraid of losing him.
I told myself that I had to get used to submitting to him and if I did God would bless our marriage.
Not
long after we got married he started giving me instructions on how to
behave as his wife — for example, I had to ask him before I offered to
babysit for friends at church.
He would commend me when I acted
submissively or treated him as the 'head'. He also demanded to be
involved in any financial decisions I made, even if it was buying myself
cheap second-hand clothes or basic items for the household.
If I bought clothes he didn't approve of, he'd make me return them, and I wasn't allowed to wear particular colours.
When
we had children he demanded that I comply with his instructions for
looking after them — for example, he'd tell me when and how to put the
babies to bed, even if he wasn't at home.
I felt myself becoming
depressed and anxious and doubting my instincts as a mother. (I believe I
suffered from postnatal depression, partly as a result of sleep
deprivation, which was compounded by the anxiety of trying to comply
with his micromanaging.)
I tried explaining my feelings to him on
a couple of occasions, but I found it difficult to tell him how his
directive style made me feel because I was so intimidated by him.
He
began studying at a theological college and was spending lots of time
away from home — he was very focused on his studies and told me it was
important he did well.
But his cold and angry treatment of me
continued: he was critical of how I prepared meals, if I forgot to set
the table to his liking, or if I did chores "too slowly". He made me
feel incompetent.
But I also couldn't ask him for help: the
church and college told me it was my role to carry the burden at home so
he could focus on ministry, and that asking for more from him would be
sinful.
I believe many of the college's teachings — on wifely
submission, for instance — laid the groundwork for men to treat their
wives badly.
As a ministry wife I was also told by the college
that it was my job to give my husband sex whenever he wanted, any time
of the day or night.
At one point, he changed the password on our
online banking so I couldn't access our joint account — he was angry
that I'd been spending a little money on one of my hobbies.
When I
protested, he told me that I wasn't "responsible" with money and he'd
need to control it all. A few days later, after I'd cried and said I was
sorry, he changed the password back, but instructed me not to spend
money without asking him first.
His constant put-downs and
criticism of me continued over the years — my parenting, housework, the
way I ran our church's playgroup — and I became very depressed.
I
started seeing a psychologist, who helped me develop strategies for how
to respond. But the more I tried to express my boundaries, the worse
the relationship seemed to get.
He started criticising and
belittling me in front of the children, too, saying: 'Mummy's no good at
tidying' or 'Mummy can't manage'. The children started to echo comments
like this back to me: "You're not very good at tidying, are you,
Mummy?"
I tried to talk to him about our marriage on several
occasions, making suggestions about how we could better manage our
finances, and that I was hopeful we could heal our relationship.
But he told me he wasn't hopeful: "I can't see a future for our marriage," he said.
I was devastated. I felt lonely, isolated and scared.
After
one particular sleepless night I stayed in bed until late in the
morning. He came in, closed the door and offered to give me a cuddle.
When he got into bed I cried on his shoulder, but he began to undress
me, which confused me.
I was scared and frozen, and couldn't
speak, but I stiffened and put my arms up in front of my chest. He
pulled off my underwear and forced himself on me, but criticised me for
not being responsive.
"If I'm going to f*** you," he said, "I
need you to kiss me." I was still frozen with shock; I had never
experienced him being like that before and had never heard him use that
language.
I no longer felt safe with him and left immediately. A
few days later, when we met to talk about how we might fix our marriage,
he told me he'd been thinking about starting a sexual relationship with
another woman.
I was stunned and upset and decided I had to leave, so I went and stayed with family.
He'd
been telling me I should leave for some time — saying I shouldn't be
around the children because I was so "mentally unstable" and that they
would be better off without me, which was distressing, and made me
contemplate suicide.
I went to the police, sought legal advice
and was supported to make official statements and develop a safety plan,
and I moved with the children into a refuge.
When I told senior
members in the church hierarchy what was happening they listened to me,
and my ex-husband is no longer in ministry. But he emptied our bank
account when I left so I had no access to income.
Eventually I
was able to find a low-paying job, though I'd really like to see the
church think seriously about providing for families who are suddenly
left with nothing because of their husband's abuse, particularly because
I was taught that, as a clergy wife, I had a duty to stay out of the
workforce so I could fully support my husband as a wife, mother and
parish volunteer.
I had nowhere to live and have been surviving off boxes of food supplied by local church ministries.
The abuse I suffered has also been challenging for me as a clergy wife because it seriously affected my personal faith.
I spent a long time wondering whether there was actually a God, and if there was, would he be like my ex-husband?
And
I wasn't able to read the bible because when I did, I'd hear my
ex-husband's voice. Even now I have to read it in other people's company
so I don't become distressed.
I recently found a group of women
who've also suffered abuse by their clergy husbands. I've been shocked
to hear how similar our experiences are, and the justifications our
husbands gave for their violence.
That network has been lifesaving for me. I thought no-one else would ever understand what I went through, or believe me.
Formerly married to an abusive Anglican minister
I
met my ex-husband through the church, when we were both studying at
bible college. He was friendly, engaging and everything I wanted in a
man, and my family loved him, too.
I was happy to have found such a wonderful friend and partner and we got engaged, then married, very quickly.
Things
changed almost immediately after we were married. He became moody and
withdrawn and, during the few hours a day when he wasn't working, would
avoid spending time with me and the children, choosing instead to play
video games or watch TV.
I tried to talk to him about it, to ask
for help with the housework or the kids, but it would only make him
angry, and he'd tell me I wasn't trying hard enough. Often he'd just get
in the car and leave, saying he couldn't handle the confrontation.
After
a few years he began studying at a theological college. I was very
supportive of his decision and was happy to embrace life as a minister's
wife.
But his temper and criticism of me became worse, and
things at home remained tense. I came to believe I was failing as a
mother and a wife, that I was as useless as he told me I was.
At
the same time, I believed it was my duty as a wife to "submit" to him.
I'd grown up hearing at church that wives must submit to and obey their
husbands as the head of the house, and so I told myself I had to fulfil
my role as the homemaker and love him no matter what.
When he was
ordained and started working in a church I thought our relationship
might improve — that he'd be free of the stress of studying and would be
able to spend more time at home. I was wrong.
He began taking
his anger out on the kids, and would push and shove them around, or hold
them down and smother them to try and stop them crying.
One time
he locked them outside for an hour in the middle of winter, without
clothes, as punishment because they'd been playing up at bedtime.
I
often tried to intervene but my attempts always blew up in my face.
He'd only get angry at me, and would tell me I was "too soft" with them
or accuse me of undermining his parenting.
He also started sexually abusing me.
He
would physically hurt me during sex by strangling me or pulling my
hair. Sometimes I worried I was going pass out, or die, because he
wouldn't know when to stop.
But I was too afraid to tell him
because when I'd expressed my displeasure before, he broke down and
cried because, he said, he felt he wasn't a good lover. Other times he
argued he wasn't being as rough with me as I said he was.
I felt
manipulated by him, but part of me felt that, by allowing him to do
these things, I was submitting to him — that giving in to his needs and
desires was a way for me to love and honour him.
Eventually, at
the encouragement of a close friend, I told the senior minister at our
church what was happening, but he didn't seem to understand the severity
of the situation.
My ex was stood down for a short time so that he could deal with some of his "anger issues".
The
minister also encouraged us to attend a Christian marriage counselling
service, which only made things worse because the counsellors were of
the view that both of us were responsible for the problems in our
marriage, which allowed him to continue blaming me for his behaviour.
His
abuse escalated to the point where I realised I had to leave. I was
terrified of how he'd react if I asked him to go, and didn't know what
he was capable of doing, so I packed some bags and took the kids to stay
with family. He moved out later that week.
I also told the
church what had happened, but they said it was up to me as to whether I
wanted to pursue a formal investigation and that there was no guarantee
of any repercussions.
The abuser would also be kept informed
during the investigation process, they said. I was terrified that
everything I told them would be reported back to him. I just thought, what's the point?
I
can understand why the process is designed that way, but I don't think
it's in victims' best interests — it's so intimidating.
Still, I
do feel like the church has made some progress when it comes to
understanding and responding to domestic violence. I was glad to hear
the recent apologies to victims of abuse in the Anglican Church — they
seemed sincere.
However, an apology without action means nothing,
and I'd like to see the church offer greater support — especially
financial support — to clergy wives who've been abused.
People in the church have told me they're praying for me, but what I need most as a single mum is financial support.
Life
since I left my ex-husband has been tumultuous, to say the least. He
has threatened on several occasions to have the children taken away from
me, which has been scary and stressful.
And helping the kids through what has been an unsettling and traumatic experience has been hard.
I trust that, even if there is no justice in this life, there will be in the next.
But my faith in the church — and in Christianity — has been totally destroyed.
Formerly married to an abusive Anglican priest
Jane
met her ex-husband through bible college, when she was very young. He
was a charming man, she says, who reassured his wife-to-be he'd be a
good father and look after her. But his abuse began almost immediately.
Most
nights during their decades-long marriage, Jane's husband would wake
her up several times for sex. If she objected, he would wait until she
fell asleep again.
"He was very sexually abusive from the start," she said.
"He
would watch pornography, drink heavily, and come to bed. I would wake
up with him touching me, inside me, and I'd say to him, 'Stop, I'm
pregnant' or 'I'm really tired' and he would just wait until I fell back
to sleep and continue. He knew how much it upset me."
If she told
him 'no' or that she didn't want to do something during sex, he'd get
angry and sulk, so Jane came to feel it was just easier to give in to
him.
She also "gave him sex so he wouldn't get angry" at their
children — therefore, she reasoned, "the kids wouldn't cop [his] abuse."
But they did. Jane would frequently try to shield her children from their father's angry outbursts.
"He
was very heavy-handed with the young kids. He would not just smack once
for discipline, he would belt four or five times, to the point there
were marks."
But her interventions made him "furious", she said,
and he'd accuse her of "disrespecting him as a father". "Sometimes it
got so physical [that] I couldn't not get involved. It was scary."
Jane
says she never felt like it was an "option" to leave, and didn't
realise she had been experiencing abuse until she sought counselling.
"I
was just so young, I thought his behaviour was normal, and a part of me
thought he was looking after me," she said. "It was all I knew."
But
she became sleep-deprived and exhausted, and her health was suffering,
so she worked up the courage to confront her ex-husband.
"I
actually went to him one night and said, 'I need a break from our sexual
relationship, I need to work through my issues and we need to work on
our marriage'. He said, 'I'm here for you, you have my support'.
"And then he proceeded to rape me."
Jane
was devastated by the assault. She became deeply depressed, stopped
eating and had a breakdown, for which she was hospitalised. "I was very
unwell for about a year, I really struggled with everything," she said.
"I lost myself in those last years of marriage, I completely lost myself. I didn't know who I was."
But
leaving her husband was a difficult process, not just for the practical
reasons of having to find somewhere to live and support herself and her
children.
The expectation of clergy families to be role models
as "the face of the church" were high, Jane said. "We were taught
through the church you always speak highly of your husband. And you obey
him, you're submissive, you ask permission to do things and that was my
life."
Jane is grateful to a local priest and his wife, whose care and compassion helped her get out, and back on her feet.
"There
was one particular pastor and his wife who were so instrumental in me
leaving, they were there from day one, so supportive," she said.
"They
helped me pack, move, they provided food and meals and the biggest
thing is that they turned around to me and said, 'We believe you'."
But she's angry about the lack of help and support she says she received from the church hierarchy.
The
recent apologies from the Anglican Church to victims of domestic abuse
"mean nothing", she says, because she doesn't feel like they cared when
she told them about her husband's abuse.
"When I left I was
treated like a criminal," she said. "[The church] wanted to get rid of
me, they wanted to pretend none of it had happened."
Having
devoted years to supporting her husband's ministry by raising their
children and volunteering in their parishes, Jane left her ex with no
money and few job prospects. What she'd most like from the Church now is
financial support, and retraining, so she can find work and rebuild her
life.
"The church needs to act," she said. "They have a
responsibility to take care of these families [who've suffered abuse by
clergy]. To make sure they're not going to be living in poverty like I'm
living in. I worry about food every day, where is food going to come
from?"
Still, she says, she's "free". Since she left she has taken
up smoking, wears more make-up and listens to music at full volume —
all of which would have intensely irritated her ex-husband.
She
plans to start studying next year and, for the first time in a long
time, is excited about her life. She has also found love again, with a
man who makes her "very happy".
"I've learnt what real
relationships are actually like," she said. "We just do normal things
that I didn't know couples did. We paint and laugh together and do
things I've never done before."
Jane still sees a psychologist
and psychiatrist, and takes medication to manage the symptoms of
depression, anxiety and PTSD. She also attends a group counselling
session for victims of domestic abuse, which she finds helpful.
But while she can't go to church without suffering a panic attack, she says her faith has remained strong.
"I wouldn't have gotten through all this without Jesus."
Formerly married to an abusive Anglican priest
Like
any young woman in the mid-70s, I dreamt of getting married to a loving
man and perhaps, one day, having a family and living happily ever
after.
I met my future husband at work; he was older and quite
flirtatious and charming. My first impression of him was that he was
arrogant — I didn't like him very much. But he persisted and eventually I
agreed to go out with him.
On our first date, at the drive-in, he
was a gentleman, paying for me, opening doors and all the other
chivalrous things that charm a young girl.
There was chemistry
between us and, after a couple of months, sex entered the relationship.
It's hard to remember if there was any overt coercion but I certainly
didn't go into it against my will. Back then, I was much stronger and
more confident.
After 10 months we got engaged, and set a wedding
date about nine months in the future. My husband to be was an active
Anglican worshipper, as was his mother — he went to church with her most
weeks.
I was not an active Christian at that stage, but sometimes
went to his church with him and was happy enough to be married in the
Anglican church of his choice. To me, a church was a church.
At
one point during our engagement, he spent the night with an old
girlfriend, though he told me nothing happened, and that she had only
rung him because she was distressed over a nasty break-up.
I
didn't believe him, though, and decided to end the relationship. I don't
know if there were other instances; I liked to believe people and trust
them — I still do.
After a lot of sweet-talking and a huge bunch of flowers, I forgave him.
In
the early days of our marriage, we lived with his parents for about
three months while our house was being built, which was very difficult
as his mother would criticise everything I did and said, including the
way I did the washing.
There would be frequent secret meetings
where she'd complain to him about my latest wrongdoings; he would then
relay them to me and I had to try and rectify them.
When I think
about it now, that was probably one of the first instances of the
emotional abuse that would become endemic in our marriage.
In the
guise of his mother's complaints, the chipping away at my confidence and
self-esteem had begun, though as a trusting 21-year-old, I couldn't see
it at the time.
We moved into our house and made friends in our new area — things seemed to be going well.
However,
one year, I asked the doctors to let me go home from hospital on the
day of his birthday with our new daughter, who'd been born days earlier.
I thought it would be a nice treat, but he was moody and
uncommunicative.
When I asked him what the problem was, he said
that he thought it was inconsiderate of me to bring home the new baby on
his birthday as it meant he had to cut short his dinner with his
parents.
What was to be a happy and joyous occasion turned into something miserable, and it was my fault.
When
my daughter was about two, he realised he was being called to be a
priest, and was soon accepted into theological college, where his food
and lodgings would be provided for by the Church.
My daughter and
I, however, had to fend for ourselves. The college had houses available
to students and their families to rent, so we sold our house, and I went
back to work full-time.
They were a tough few years, with little
or no money, and it was hard to keep doing things together as a family
due to his studies. But, like a good wife, I supported him as it was for
the greater good of God and the Church.
Then the abuse began. I
was subjected to predominantly verbal, emotional, financial, social and
sexual abuse — he knew the minute he physically abused me I would walk.
At that stage, I didn't understand domestic violence came in many guises. Examples of his behaviour include:
Picking out what wine I would drink and what books I read - I was told what I liked
Checking
up on where I was, how long I would be, and what time I would be home;
if I didn't stick to the plan I was questioned as to why
Giving
me weekly housekeeping money, one note at a time, counted out on to the
dining room table — if I needed more I was asked to provide a specific
amount; any excess not used was to be returned to him
Telling me I was not allowed to cut my hair short otherwise he would divorce me
Constantly reminding me that it was my wifely duty to "obey" him in all things and submit to his sexual fantasies
Even
when I did part-time or casual work, I never saw any of the money as it
went straight to our joint account and I wasn't allowed to touch it
… and the list goes on.
Of
course, as he was the parish priest, nobody ever saw this side of him;
he came across as very charming to most. Still, he blamed me for
whatever went wrong or was not to his liking.
I didn't do or say
the right things; my opinion was not important, let alone valued, to the
point where I would just agree to everything to keep the peace and to
make life easier for me and the children.
There were two specific
times when I planned to leave. The first was when he was in theological
college: life was miserable and I felt abandoned by the Church.
But
my daughter was only four years old so I was careful not to make too
quick a decision. If it had just been me, I would have gone without
hesitation.
The second time, we were in a country parish in South
Australia. I was tired and fed up, but 500 kilometres from Adelaide,
with no financial means to get there.
As I didn't want to land on my parents' doorstep with two kids, no money and no job, I abandoned the idea.
When we moved from that town to another closer to Adelaide, I decided to go back to work.
One
night, after I had prepared dinner for us all for his birthday, he
suggested we should go for a walk. He told me that unless I was prepared
to give in to his depraved sexual demands, the marriage was over.
I
was furious: I had gone to all this trouble for his birthday, whilst
working full time, and now he was giving me an ultimatum? I had a moment
of clarity and told him the marriage was over — I was not prepared to
give him what he wanted.
When we first split up, he told me that
if I let him give me financial advice, he would be happy to provide some
financial assistance. I told him that as I worked for an accountancy
firm I had expert advice available to me. This didn't go down well and I
never saw a cent out of our joint savings.
When I finally left
him, all I had were the children (my two most treasured possessions), my
clothing, the children's clothing and belongings and a few items we
"agreed" on.
I ended up sleeping on a mattress on the floor for
some months as he insisted on keeping the bedroom furniture, as well as
the washing machine and clothes dryer.
He didn't want me, but didn't like that fact that I had gone either, so endeavoured to make life as difficult as possible.
My
lawyer prepared a statement requesting some financial reimbursement for
the decades of our marriage. It was fair, but he wouldn't agree and a
lengthy and costly (for me) argy-bargy ensued.
In the end, I
managed to get some of his superannuation via the Family Court but it
cost me dearly in legal fees, which I had to pay off as I was struggling
financially.
The Church hierarchy didn't offer any help, either —
it all seemed to be too hard for them. In their view, I was in the
wrong — not him — because I had left him.
In the end, they sent him to a parish in Queensland, and continued to support him in various ways.
I
don't really know what kept me going through the divorce process. I
certainly lacked confidence and self-esteem and suffered from
depression, for which I took medication and saw a psychologist.
I didn't go to church for a long time — I was disillusioned and hurting.
I
eventually started going to a Catholic church as I felt I could walk in
and talk to God without being distracted by the anger and frustration I
felt with the church organisation itself. Even on my darkest days, I
never felt deserted by God, only the church.
In one of the very
few major arguments I had with my ex after the split, when he was
throwing scripture up at me, I remember yelling at him that his abuse
was not God-based or scripturally supported and that God was crying
buckets over what he was doing.
I still suffer a major depressive
disorder. My psychiatrist said I have a genetic predisposition for
depression and that had I married someone who was supportive and
nurturing, I may not have suffered so severely.
However, I have
managed to bring up two kids on my own with little money, maintain a
full-time job and somehow make it to this point in one piece, but not
unscathed.
Part of the problem, Kylie
says, is that in some churches, women are told sexual availability is a
wife's responsibility and that while this teaching is intended to foster
intimacy in marriage, some men misinterpret it as meaning they can
demand what they want, when they want.
"[At Moore Theological
college in Sydney, where my husband trained] we were given regular
specific teaching sessions that would help us be good minister's wives.
"Things
like, your job is to give your husband sex whenever he wants it anytime
of the day or night … this is the message we were given: be ready if he
pops home in his lunch break to drop everything, and have sex.
"We were never ever given any hint that it might be okay to say no."
Emily
says she was never taught at that college that women had to provide sex
without consent, "but the teaching on sex was extremely coercive".
"We
were told that we, as wives, are the only people who can serve our
husbands in this way, and the strong implication was that we were
harming [our husbands'] gospel ministry by not giving it," she said.
"I
even heard one Moore College lecturer teach from the front that sex
should be provided daily. And he gave biblical 'evidence'."
Similar concerns about marital rape in some faith forums have been aired recently in America.
Men
were also advised a woman's unwillingness to submit to her husband's
desire for sex is a "sinful rebellion against God's design".
No true Christian would advise or condone rape. This is anathema to the faith, and the faithful.
But
what abuse survivors have told the ABC repeatedly is that there is tone
deafness in some influential quarters and powerful theological colleges
to teaching on sex that fails to recognise the importance of mutual
consent. The consequences of this are horrific.
There are several
recent examples. In 2016, at a conference for women in Sydney where
domestic violence was discussed, a session on "Appreciating God's Gift
of Sex" gave as one example of challenges that can "fracture the beauty
of sex", along with pornography and busyness: "women calling the shots
in the bedroom".
Other statements made included: "Like the rest
of the Christian life, sex is about service", and, "One way we serve our
spouse is by fulfilling the sexual obligation we owe".
In 2008,
in a parody of C. S. Lewis's The Screwtape Letters, one senior woman
wrote that God, "really thinks we have an obligation to give our
husbands as much sex as he wants!"
In this context, she cited a
verse from Corinthians: "For the wife does not have authority over her
own body, but the husband does."
Coercion 'has no place in clergy marriages'
When
Moore College recently published a guide for clergy wives called
Domestic Violence: A Starting Point in Supporting Victims, the clergy
wives who were actual victims fumed.
In advice on "Building
Healthy Marriages", the author says the only reason for denying your
husband sex is by "mutual consent", so you can devote yourself to
prayer.
Sex, she wrote, "should be seen as the cement in the relationship — it is not just the icing on the cake".
What
truly angered the women, though, was that the first two chapters of the
guide, written by the head of Moore Theological College in Newtown,
Mark Thompson, were dedicated solely to upholding the doctrine of
submission.
"I think there's some good content in there," said
Kylie. "But you have to read through around 25 or 30 pages of defending
the church's teachings about [male] headship and [female] submission
before you even get to anything focused on the victims in any way."
Dr
Thompson, speaking to 7.30 in his home opposite the college near Sydney
University, says while he is aware there have been other cases, he has
only ever met with one clergy wife who had been abused by her husband.
He says she did not ask for any clarification of the meaning of
submission.
The reason he puts so much emphasis on the "right
kind" of submission, he says, is "precisely because people are using the
language of submission in a way that is contrary to the way the bible
does".
"I want to be the most vocal voice saying you've misused
the Bible ... the Bible's teaching on marriage is that it is modelled on
the loving self sacrifice of Christ who loved the church by dying for
it so he could save it — that's what submission means in this particular
context," he said.
"It's got nothing to do with power, domination, nothing to do with coercion."
Sex,
Dr Thompson says, "is a good gift that does operate as one of the glues
of good marriages [but] to demand sex and not see it as a free gift is
to take something good and destroy it.
"One of the ways we serve
in marriage is a giving of our bodies to one another freely and
voluntarily ... The insistence, the demand, coercion, has no place in
marriage at all, and it has no place in clergy marriages."
The
Moore College Domestic Violence Policy, which was finalised in May 2015,
spells out, "domestic violence is contrary to the biblical pattern of
mutual love and care of each other in marriage, anchored in the example
of the Lord Jesus Christ".
It also decreed the College would not
"tolerate, overlook or conceal" any instance of domestic violence in the
College community.
But some of the wives whose husbands studied
at Moore object to the stipulation in the policy that, "the person who
has acted violently" will need to meet with the dean or principal to
show cause why they, "should be allowed to continue as a member of the
College community, complete their studies, or continue in their role as a
member of the Faculty or a chaplain".
Why, they ask, should men be allowed to stay there if they have acted violently?
Dr
Thompson says they most likely won't. The policy, he says, is "framed
in the way in which you need to frame these policies … but the plan is,
every person who'd come, engaged in domestic violence, is not suitable
to be involved in ministry".
He said: "If somebody has been shown
to act violently they would be counselled out of training and ministry,
[though] you need to leave room for some of these issues to be sorted
through, we just wanted to be fair and equitable and just."
He
recognises, though, that significant work remains: "I'm not satisfied
that we've yet done enough and one of the reasons why we apologised in
the synod recently was because we recognised that not enough has been
done. But we're saying we want to do more than we've done."
An apology without action 'means nothing'
Rebecca
is cautious: "I think they're allowing perpetrators to continue on, one
in ministry, and two to continue abusing. There's really no
repercussions for someone who's found out to be abusive and I think they
really undermine the power that an abuser has within his family and how
terrifying that is," she said.
"I think there should just be something in place to make sure there's swift action taken."
Canon
Sandy Grant, the chairman of the Sydney Anglican Domestic Violence Task
Force, says the stories he has heard of marital rape are disturbing.
"There
is no excuse for forcing yourself on another person, sexually, or
demanding sex from another person and I'm shocked and appalled to hear
that there have been cases where that's happened," he said.
The reason Canon Grant led an apology to all victims of domestic violence
in the church at Sydney Synod a few weeks ago was because he realised:
"I as a conservative had not done enough to guard against the twistings
of scripture in ways that give comfort to abusers or that victims might
hear as inviting them to continue as the victims and not to get the help
they need. I was convinced we needed to do more."
To some survivors, the Anglican Church's apology was a good and welcome start, but to others, it was simply a symbolic gesture.
Jane
says: "[It] means nothing because when I left I was treated like a
criminal … They [the church] wanted to get rid of me, they wanted to
pretend none of [my abuse] happened. There was no real support … I need
help and understanding, not someone saying you're out of our sight now,
we don't have to worry about you."
Others are more optimistic.
Rebecca
was pleased to at last have some acknowledgment, which she believes to
be sincere, but adds: "An apology without action is empty so I'd like to
see further things put in place to make sure they really mean what they
say."
How are churches dealing with abusive clergy?
There
is very little data on abusive clergy in Australia, largely because
churches have not systematically collected and recorded it.
But
ABC News asked all the major Christian churches in Australia (excluding
the Catholic Church, which requires priests to be celibate), how they
have handled allegations of domestic abuse against clergy in the past 10
years.
(While the 7.30 story focused on one particular support
group of women from Sydney Anglican churches, ABC News surveyed the rest
of the country as well, over a period of months, searching for
information about abused clergy wives across denominations).
Many
said they were unable to disclose data on these kinds of complaints
because the information was either too sensitive, too difficult to
compile or simply unavailable.
However, a handful of churches said they had received and acted on some complaints in which domestic abuse was a factor.
The
NSW Presbyterian Church, according to Mrs Elizabeth McLean, the CEO of
the Safe Churches Unit, has acted on domestic violence policies with
respect to ministers and other church leaders, "on a small number of
occasions in recent years".
And a spokesman for Baptist Churches NSW and ACT said:
"Over
the last five years we can recall less than five allegations received
by our office of domestic violence by clergy. All of these were
extensively investigated, including, where required by our policies, by
an independent investigator … appropriate disciplinary action was taken
where any allegations were substantiated."
It's clear the church
is currently grappling with how best to prevent and respond to domestic
violence, as are a host of institutions.
But many churches seem to
be taking an ad-hoc, piecemeal approach; while a handful have
introduced policies specifically for handling domestic violence, others
have scrambled to adapt or extend child sexual abuse protocols to
include domestic abuse.
Survivors claim many churches seem to be
preoccupied with avoiding public scrutiny following the revelations of
child sexual abuse in the royal commission, and have sought to handle
abuse matters quickly and quietly behind closed doors, often to the
detriment of victims.
And even where formal domestic violence
policies do exist, there is frequently a lack of clarity around what, if
any, the professional consequences for clergy found to be abusing their
spouse would be.
Church leaders may espouse "no tolerance" for domestic violence, but survivors say it's rarely put into practice.
If
a complaint were to be made against clergy in the Anglican Diocese of
Melbourne, for example, a spokesperson said: "It would be both a matter
of 'fitness' for continued ministry and — if the complaint was upheld —
there would be an independent disciplinary process including, but not
limited to, deposition from holy orders."
Bishop Richard Condie of
the Anglican Diocese of Tasmania said if such a complaint were
received, "The clergy person against whom the allegations were made
would be immediately stood down".
Criminal matters, he said, would
be reported to the police, an internal investigation would take place,
and a "diocesan tribunal" would be convened to hear the allegations.
Importantly,
some churches and training institutions (including Moore Theological
College) have begun to make efforts to screen men for bullying or
violent tendencies before accepting them as candidates for ordination.
Assistant
Bishop Tim Harris, from the Anglican Diocese of Adelaide, said: "We now
apply rigorous psychological testing before being accepted for
formation. We have declined to accept at least half a dozen candidates
for concerns over inappropriate behaviour or character traits."
Life after abuse: Homelessness, poverty, PTSD
What
remains of greatest concern for survivors, though, is the lack of any
significant financial provision for the wives of abusive clergy.
These
women, who have sometimes served parishes for decades, raising families
while their husbands prepared sermons and hosted bible study groups,
are suddenly left without a source of income when they leave their
marriage.
Rectors' wives are required to move out of church housing, and many have nowhere to go.
This
is the case in churches across the world. Lesley Orr Macdonald, the
author of Out of the Shadows: Christianity and Violence Against Women in
Scotland (2000) writes:
"Discrimination against women who have
had to divorce abusive clergy husbands (and whose status and right to
church support is much less secure than that of clergy widows) must end …
These should be matters of church policy and justice, and not left to
piecemeal, inconsistent, case-by-case responses."
Survivors are torn when the church has responded to abuse by demoting their ex-husbands without providing financial support.
When
Kylie told senior members in the Anglican Church what was happening,
she says: "They listened to me, and my ex-husband is no longer in
ministry."
But, she adds: "He emptied our bank account when I left
so I had no access to income. Eventually I was able to find a
low-paying job, though I'd really like to see the church think seriously
about providing for families who are suddenly left with nothing because
of their husband's abuse."
Jane, who spent decades working
without pay in her husband's parish and raising young children, also
wants the church to acknowledge their duty of care:
"The church
needs to act … they have a responsibility to take care of these
families. To make sure they're not going to be living in poverty like
I'm living in. I worry about food every day, where is food going to come
from?" What she wants most of all is retraining for the workforce.
Some churches have taken tentative steps to remedy this problem, most notably the Sydney Anglicans.
Their
synod last month passed a motion asking its standing committee to
create a "generously provisioned" long-term operating fund to assist
clergy spouses and lay stipendiary workers left in financial hardship as
a result of separation because of domestic abuse.
The motion,
presented by Mark Tough, senior minister at St Clement's Anglican Church
in Lalor Park, requested the fund be established "as a matter of
urgency". The size and structure of the fund are yet to be determined.
Reverend
Tough's motion asked the synod to acknowledge the church's
responsibility to ensure ordination candidates are fit to enter — and
then remain in — Holy Orders, as well as that, "A key reason why
domestic abuse victims might find it difficult to separate from their
spouses is because of potential financial hardship (especially where
children are involved)".
He requested the standing committee —
like the cabinet of the synod, or core governing body — ensure any funds
allocated for abused clergy wives be distributed quickly.
Urgent.
Generous. Quickly. This motion was passed without objection. Now the
women are waiting to see what the Standing Committee decides.
This
is the same committee that recently allocated $1 million of the
Archbishop's discretionary funds to the unsuccessful No campaign against
same-sex marriage, which infuriated them.
"I was very angry to
hear that," says Kylie. "I was so disappointed, I thought about the
women I know who don't have enough to eat, who can't feed their
children, because they've been victims of abuse by clergy and what's the
church doing for them?"
Sandy Grant dismisses the comparison
between the $5,000 spent on the Domestic Violence Task Force and the
million on the no campaign as "apples and oranges".
"As I said in
my speeches to synod, at no stage, as chairman of that taskforce, has
our work ever been inhibited by that funding and we're pleased to be
able to get where we've got," he said.
"I'd say the value of the
volunteer labour of the professionals, different capacities, who've
served on the committee and advised the taskforce is incalculable. Our
overall church response to domestic violence, of course, involves many
millions."
'We have a responsibility to help'
It is
crucial to understand that a group of priests — including some in
Sydney, like Reverend Mark Tough in Lalor Park, Reverend Michael Jensen
in Darling Point, Reverend Geoff Broughton in Paddington and Reverend
Bruce Clarke in Manly — are doing important work in this area, and
creating parishes where women are supported and listened to.
Each
of them is eager for people to understand the church should be a place
of safety, support and refuge, and survivors have begun seeking them
out.
All of the women interviewed by ABC News had at least one
positive experience with a member of clergy, some of which were
fundamental to their survival.
At Jane's lowest point, she says a sympathetic priest saved her life.
"There
was one particular pastor and his wife who were so instrumental in me
leaving, they were there from day one, so supportive … they helped me
pack, move, they provided food and meals and the biggest thing is that
they turned around to me and said, 'We believe you'."
When well-meaning ministers meet abused women, often their perspective changes.
Reverend
Tough said he asked the synod to consider providing financial
assistance because he had witnessed firsthand the struggles of a clergy
wife he had been helping.
"I discovered that she was experiencing
financial hardship as a result of her separation and, in response to an
enquiry that she made to the diocese, she was told that there was not
much that the diocese could do for her," he said.
But when he
asked the Archbishop what financial support was available to spouses of
clergy who had separated due to domestic abuse, he was told only
"limited" support could be offered, so he moved his motion at synod to
set up a fund.
"I firmly believe that we as a diocese have a
responsibility to help spouses in these awful circumstances because
these abuses have occurred under our watch by people whom we deemed to
be fit for office," he said.
Such initiatives are strongly supported by survivors and advocates like Isabella Young.
She
also thinks there should be a church-funded rehabilitation program for
abused clergy wives, especially given they, "have been encouraged to
marry young and subvert their careers and desires to their husbands, to
have multiple children and to work for free among their congregations".
They
also get moved out of church housing "far too quickly", Ms Young says,
"with little regard as to the unpaid service they have shown the church,
the silence they have misguidedly held far too long for the sake of the
church, or implicit 'goodness' that the church had imbued to their
monstrous spouse by … not picking up on [his] character defects sooner".
Ms
Young says these women are also torn between their desire to see
justice for what has occurred and the fact that the more "fuss" they
make about their abuse, "the less able their ex will be to pick up a job
in a school or para-church organisation" and be able to provide child
support.
"They shouldn't have to worry about that," she said.
What
is also needed now, the women say, is strong cultural change, and a
challenging of why "submission" has become such a core teaching in
pockets of the church when it has been documented to enable violent men.
Kylie, who has spent much of her life in university Christian
groups, bible colleges and parishes, says bluntly: "I really want the
church to face up to the fact that this is actually a widespread
problem, it's not the case of one or two bad apples, these men are
coming out of a culture that has really almost trained them to be like
that."
So what happened to the abusive priests in our case studies?
And how did the church discipline them, if at all?
There is no consistent pattern among denominations, though more are now being stood down, at least temporarily.
Two
senior ministers in Jess's Presbyterian church referred to her
husband's abuse as a, "communication problem with the use of force" that
needed counselling.
Her husband was taken aside to discuss the
matter with local leaders; her view was never sought. "Churches need to
be aware that … it is easy for male perpetrators to continue to abuse
when women are not given a voice, or believed," she said.
Emily's
husband was stood down from ministry, but the reason the bishop gave
for his demotion was not that he'd been abusive, she says, "but that he
and I weren't likely to reconcile".
"At no point did the bishop or
any of his staff check in on me to see if I was all right — no-one told
me my ex-husband's behaviour was intolerable, and that they supported
me," she said.
"The message I got was that I'd chosen to leave — that I had destroyed my husband's ministry and made him lose his job."
By the time Linda told a pastor at her Presbyterian church about her abuse, her husband had quit his ministry position.
The pastor told Linda it, "was okay to do what was best for her", but no action was ever taken against her abusive ex.
Some
in her church community disapproved of her leaving her husband. Part of
the problem, Linda believes, is the general lack of awareness in
society about domestic violence.
Kate's Anglican priest
ex-husband was also stood down when she told the hierarchy of his abuse.
Not long after she'd left him, a fellow priest told her he'd been
checking in on her ex, and that he was "suicidal" at the thought of
losing her.
"I don't know if [the priest] was telling me because
he felt I should be taking responsibility for my ex's mental state, or
because he didn't know what else to say or how to help," Kate said.
"I
now try to have compassion for that response — he was probably as lost
as I was, sitting with the fact that a fellow priest had done this.
Perhaps he didn't know what to believe, and was floundering."
Other
priests since then have been wonderfully supportive and sensitive to
Kate's needs as she works to rebuild her life and relearn trust.
"I
am working with a brilliant and very skilful priest in trying to find a
way to live with all this, and I am grateful for his ministry," she
said.
"But it will be a long and painful process, one that I hope will make me a whole person again."
At
the urging of her mother and some close friends, Lucy approached the
leaders of her Pentecostal church and told them what had happened. She
said the church leaders believed her, and told her they would cancel his
credentials, though she never received any written confirmation of
this.
(The website for the church where he continues to serve as pastor states that it is still affiliated with the denomination.)
Lucy
has also been furious to discover other clergy wives have suffered
abuse like her, and was devastated to learn many have since abandoned
their faith because of it.
"These [abusive] men have nothing to
do with God," she said. "They're evil men, they really are. And they're
using Christianity and the bible to manipulate, control and abuse women
and it's got to stop.
"Churches need to take [abused] women's
voices very seriously. There should be options available to women —
legal action or something — that overrides church leaders' power. It's
just not good enough."
Even worse, the women say, the church knew all of this in 1990. And countless women have been abused since then.
All of the stories told to ABC News of rape, assault, tracking and control happened after the churches had been warned.
Most
of the clergy interviewed by the ABC said only one thing had led to the
recent flurry of apologies and reports in the past two years: women
scraping together the courage to tell their stories.
'I hope you're somewhere, praying, praying'
Churchmen who assault clergy wives also damage their beliefs in what Kylie calls "a huge, sudden attack on our personal faith".
After
she left her husband, she said, "I couldn't read the Bible anymore
because I was hearing it in his voice, I'd look at the words and hear
his voice speaking and it just put me back in that situation and it was
too traumatic."
When Jane goes to church she has panic attacks. Emily is still part of a parish and says she is rediscovering her faith.
"There
was a period during my marriage when I couldn't read my Bible at all,
and I couldn't pray, because I was so angry that God would oblige me to
remain in a situation that was so unliveable," she said.
"I was so furious at the advice of Christian leaders over the years to 'rejoice in suffering' and 'be content'."
When
she did eventually pick up her Bible again, she said: "There were
certain passages I couldn't read, particularly the verses about
submission, which made me angry because they'd been used to keep me in
my place for so long.
"My husband had told me I must submit to and obey him, but he ignored his responsibility to lay down his life for his wife.
"I've
come to believe that submission in a marriage is not about dominating
or demanding servitude; the gospel is not about being a law keeper, it's
about grace, and a man — Jesus — who laid down his life for his
enemies.
"It's about showing love to people who are broken, and so I always try to come back to that."
This is part of the debate about Kesha's song, Praying, that Jane loves so much.
Kesha
has been involved in her own legal battles with a man she claims abused
her for years; is she wrong to sing for someone's reform, to hope that
they will fall on their knees and pray?
Is it sheer foolishness or grace? Or is she merely surprised to be discovering her own strength?
As
the sun sets over the swing set in her backyard, and the neighbour's
dogs bawl and bark, Jane is still dancing around the kitchen, grinning,
singing, turning up the sound as loud as it will go.
I'm proud of who I am No more monsters, I can breathe again And you said that I was done Well, you were wrong and now the best is yet to come... I hope you're somewhere, praying, praying.
*The names of survivors have been changed for security and legal reasons.
This
is part of an ABC News investigative series into religion and domestic
violence. We are seeking to understand and report on cultural issues in
faith communities that might impact on the behaviours of perpetrators of
intimate partner violence and the responses of victims.
As Israel Folau considers his legal options in the wake of his
sacking by Rugby Australia, other Australian sports are keeping a close
eye on proceedings in what could be a landmark case for freedom of
speech for deeply religious athletes.
Even as Tony Abbott was campaigning during what he called the
fight of his life, he still didn't seem able to comprehend what was
happening to him and his political career.
The personal and political blend in Marcelo Martinessi's
award-winning film about a middle-aged aristocrat whose loss of fortune
brings a windfall of independence.