Statistical significance and statistical power in hypothesis testing - Lieber - 1990 - Journal of Orthopaedic Research - Wiley Online Library
Volume 8, Issue 2
Invited Opinion
Free Access

Statistical significance and statistical power in hypothesis testing

Dr. Richard L. Lieber

Corresponding Author

Division of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Veterans Administration Medical Center and University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.

Division of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation (V‐151), V.A. Medical Center and U.C. San Diego School of Medicine, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92161, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
First published: March 1990
Citations: 68

Abstract

Experimental design requires estimation of the sample size required to produce a meaningful conclusion. Often, experimental results are performed with sample sizes which are inappropriate to adequately support the conclusions made. In this paper, two factors which are involved in sample size estimation are detailed—namely type I (α) and type II (β) error. Type I error can be considered a “false positive” result while type II error can be considered a “false negative” result. Obviously, both types of error should be avoided. The choice of values for α and β is based on an investigator's understanding of the experimental system, not on arbitrary statistical rules. Examples relating to the choice of α and β are presented, along with a series of suggestions for use in experimental design.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.